Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
The qualifications concerning the initiation of substances in "Palikabandh" differ from each other. The definitions of substance and quality in "Tattvartha" have a greater resemblance to those in the Vaisheshika philosophy. The definitions regarding results in "Tattvartha" and the Sankhya philosophy are identical. "Tattvartha" refers to substances, qualities, and modes in the context of the seven realities, emphasizing the relevant notions of reality according to Sankhya's perspective and the principles of result-oriented classification seen in Vaisheshika, which mainly considers substances, qualities, and karmas as primary realities.
The fundamental issues discussed in "Charitramimamsa" include: What activities exist in life? What are the root causes of such harmful activities? If it is possible to abandon these harmful activities, through what types of measures can this be achieved, and what kinds of activities should be incorporated into life instead? What is the eventual result of all this in life? These thoughts are expressed from Chapter Six to Chapter Ten of "Charitramimamsa". Due to the distinctly different definitions and sectarian framework of Jain philosophy, it may seem as if it does not share any commonality with other philosophies; however, for one who meticulously studies the Buddhist and Vedic perspectives, it becomes evident that Jain "Charitramimamsa" shares more than just a superficial connection with these two philosophies, particularly regarding the subject of character-focused teachings.