________________
P. 357. A. 6. S. 7.] 198 sense of resemblance between the pega and the 39tetet that is between the उपमेय and उपमान, but the sense of resemblance is not as pronounced as in the figure 3941, and hence the difference between 3941 and this figure of speech. In this figure #94, the subject-matter depends entirely on the volition of the speaker. It is bound to differ in very individual case; for instance in the verse 552 there is a string of things which have one common quality efe but the subject-matter depends on the volition of the speaker. Thus every time in this figure one thing only becomes the subject-matter and the rest of them become statas-merely illustrations. Intoxication creates joy, joy creates love which chases away all pride, love in its turn creates longing for the union of one's darling and longing results in intolerable agony of mind.
Here, in this verse, the chain of cause and effect does not militate against the figure 97, for even in the figure gear such chains are permissible. For instance, see the following verse containing उपमा. .
The words प्रकृताप्रकृतानाम् in the definition of दीपक can be interpreted in three ways:
(1) One is going and the rest are 879Has (2) all are gas. (3) All are stigns. The first gives rise to the kind of 44% which is accepted by all other rhetoricians. But the second and the third kinds of #9%, based on the second and the third interpretations of the words
anggarai 08, is not accepted by others. According to #FAC and others, where there is a string of somet things, the figure is grafnar.
Similarly where there is a string of 249as only, there also the figure is great fiat. Both these kinds of the figure तुल्ययोगिता are included under दीपक by हेमचन्द्र..
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
