________________
: 28 :
SPIRITUALISM AND ETHICS
The conduct of the man who lives in the world of the spirit is different from that of the man who lives an ordilife of give and take. Both of them conduct themselves in the world. They cannot remain idle. The Ācārānga says that a man given spiritual life must act of his own free will. The man who lives in the ordinary life of give and take does not act of his own free will. He simply reacts. He does unto others what they do unto him. Such a reaction negates free will and the sense of values.
Modern ethics has considered the question of moral conduct at length. The philosopher Kant, for example, holds the view that our actions should be governed by the sense of duty rather than by the feelings of pity and compassion or by the idea of doing good to others. Action based on such feelings is not moral action. Only actions inspired by man's free will can be said to be moral. Our conduct should on the sense of duty only.
Kant's view is a correct view. The feeling of pity and compassion is a reaction conditioned by the miserable plight of the man whom we pity or for whom we show compassion. Friendliness, on the other hand, is not a reaction. It is based on the conviction that every living being possesses a soul like us, and therefore, we should be friendly towards it.
To be pleased by praise and annoyed by blame is a reaction. There is no philosophy or conviction behind reaction. What the Ācārānga insists on is Anyathā Vyavahāra or conduct
spired by free will. Such conduct is creative and not reactionary. The spiritual man's actions are creative actions inspired by the sense of duty. He does not think in termes of the give and take of ordinary life. He does not help others
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
