________________
374
PIOTR BALCEROWICZ
IS INEXPLICABILITY OTHERWISE OTHERWISE INEXPLICABLE? 375
anyaka wadyabhjoreto-retu-gocara-markimwahl priya bhared dhelur widdharekio yarha / dhamka-gund-sampratsamasya pariwdharalt/
matarve wind laksyu-inderen gunetaran // The same idea is expressed in NKC p. 437.4-11.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
BALCEROWICZ 2000
BALCEROWICZ 2001
not have to indicate (one's own purpose in argument), because a particular understanding of the person to be taught is the purpose of the matter to be indicated to him. For the person to be taught can be someone slow-witted or someone sharpwitted. Out of them, for the one who is slow-witted a particular understanding of the matter in question cannot be accomplished without the pronouncement of the thesis, neither (can this be accomplished) for someone who has understood the linguistic convention [govering the pronouncement of the five-mernbered proof formula of the Naiyayika and others (and) who even is not slow-witted, because when the pronouncement of this thesis is not made thereby a the point of defeat can be announced, in compliance with NS 5.2.12: "[The proof formula) is deficient even when one of the members) is missing." However, if for someone sharp-witted-who has acquired the understanding of the matter in question merely through the pronouncement of the logical reason, even without the pronouncement of this [thesis)--this (pronouncement of the thesis) were considered) purposeless, then also the pronouncement of the logical reason would [have to be considered) purposeless, because it can be empirically observed that soneone (may acquire the understanding of the matter in question merely through the pronouncement of a person who has certain knowledge and who is not deceitful which has merely the form of the thesis "There on the hilly there is fire", or similar.' This opinion is subsequently rejected by Prabhacandra as follows. First, we have to state the thesis in order to show what our argument aims at (NKC p. 437.4-11), here Prabbicandra uses the analogy of an archer, well-known from NA 16 (widerspra, n. 107). Secondly, even if our argument can be understood by stating the thesis alone, we still have to formulate the logical reason as the rule that warrants the correctness of our reasoning (NKC p. 437.12-438.4). 10 CE. NA 18:
sadhu-sadhanawor wpir putra musicale Saram/ Sidharwyena sa crnah samhandhosmarin matall -'Such (a statement) in which the invariable concomitance between the probandum and the probans is determined in the best possible way Areause of the
recollection of the relation is known as the example based on similarity. 109 NAV 13.2: ... Aadli heyvandanom en browserdida drop samstdrinila nairarthaud the demonstration of the logical reason alone is carried out (scit suffices to mention solely the logical reason) because the explicit statement of the remaining (members of the proof formula)-inasmuch as they have the form of subliminal impressions in the hearer-is purposeless. 100 NAV 13.2: ewa mawwale wat pratänas padomundan tanyak para subtena pramed print thanai latka ya mata pandangan latra dasigaw sidhanam pravidandadhart ladyarto... lada hepatipidanam ex brvare, erdhidhanasa sharmandiriai atrarhalde-The author] maintains that there is not only one variety of the inference for others, but also that the cognoscible object should be conveyed meticulously to another person) in such a way so that the awareness of the cognoscible comes about easily on the part of the other person. For this purpose), there is the ten-membered proof as the means of demonstration (of the cognoscible object), namely ... Then the demonstration of the logical reason alone is carried out (se it suffices to mention solely the logical reason) because the explicit statement of the remaining (members of the proof formula)-- inasmuch as they have the form of subliminal impressions in the hearer-is purposeless. Comp. however PV (P) 3.27cd: widesni deo heter er i krvalak*Since for scholars simply the logical reason alone is to be stated. I NA 14cd-16:
tar-prayogo irabartavo kevor Jacana diatas /
BHATT 1989
- Anth-dara. Kangle, RP: The Kawnia Arthariintra. Part I: A
Critical Edition with a Glasrary, Part II: An English Translation with Critical and Explanatory Noves. Part III: A Sony University of Bombay, Bombay 1960, 1963, 1965. (Reprinted:
Delhi 1986-881 - Balcerowicz, Piotr: "On the Date of the Mahard', in:
Balcerowicz, Piotr; Mejor, Marek (eds.): On the Understanding of other cwuer. Proceedings of an International Conference on Sestri and Related Studies to commemorate the Centenary of the Birth of Naminlaw Schayer (1899-1941), Warsaw Unversity, Poland. Oamber 7-10, 1999. Saidia Indoline 7 (2000), Instytut Orientalistyczny, Uniwersytet Warszawski,
Warsaw 2000: 17-57. - Balcerowicz, Piotr Jaina Estemology in Historical and
Comune Perspective Critical Edition and English Translation of logical-Egersemlogical Treanser: Martina Me tira-witi and
M arina-gaan with Introduction and Noves. Volume I & II. Alt- und New-ladische Studien 53,1 &
53,2. Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2001. = Bhatt, Govardhan P.: The Basic ways of Krowing. An In-depth
Study of manila's Contribution to Indian Epistemology
Second Revised Edition, Motilal Banarsidass, Delhi 1989. - Bhattacharyya, B.: "Foreword' to Tarrasarigrala of
S arabica see TSa (1).i-cxvii. = Chatterjee, Asim Kumar. A Comprehensive Huntry of Javni
up to 10W ADA Firma KLM Private Lid., Calcutta 1978. - Durvekamišra: Dharma tar-prady Pandie Dureta Men's
Dharmarapradina dering a swimmentary on armadares Maatinti-ile, SCOmmentary romati s கள்). Edited by Pt. Dalsukhbhai Malvania, Kashi Prasad Jayaswal,
Research Institute, Patna 1971 = Franco, Eli: "Valid reason, true sign', Wiener Zeitschrift für die
Kinde Süd- und Ontaries (Wien) (1990) 199-208. - Frauwallner, Erich: "Zu den Fragmenten buddhistischer Logiker
im Nyayavarttikam', Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Morgenlander (Wien) 40 (1933) 300-304 (reprinted in: Frauwallner, Erich: Kleine Schriften, hrsg. von Gerhard Oberhammer und Erst Steinkellner, Glassenapp-Stiftung 22, Franz Steiner Verlag, Wiesbaden 1982: pp. 479 483).
BHATTACHARYYA 1926 CHATTERJEE 1978
DhPP
FRANCO 1990
FRAUWALLNER 1933
