________________
Dignāga on trairūpya Reconsidered: A Reply to Prof. Oetke
265
med pa la med pa de ni gtan tshigs yin no zhes bya ba yin no / de la ni mthun pa kho na la yod pa zhes bya ba'i nges par gaung ba 'di kho nas gtan tshigs mi mthun pa las ldog pa grub mod kyi / de med pa la med pa zhes bsgrub par bya ba med pa la med pa [763] smos pa gang yin pa de ni med pa kho na la med pa yin gyi 'gal ba la yang ma yin la de las gzhan pa la yang ma yin no zhes brnan pa'i phyir yin te / de lta bas na brnan pa yin par dogs pa
bstsal ba'i phyir nye bar btags pa yin no // 7) For references see my paper "On Trairüpya Formulae".
See for example Jinendrabuddhi's Țikā on PS II. 5cd (Derge 93b-94a): de mtshungs la yod gyur (=tattulye sadbhāvah) ni rjes su 'gro ba (=anvaya) mtshon par rig par bya ste / ... rjes su 'gro ba ni tshul gnyis pa'o zhes pa'o I... rjes su 'gro ba zhes bya ba ni rtags la rtags can yod pa kho na ste / ... med pa la med pa nyid (=asati năstită) ni Idog pa (=vyatireka) nye bar mtshon par yang blta bar bya'o / Idog pa yang tshul gsum pa'o.../. Cf. also Tarkabhāṣā (of Mokşākaragupta, ed by Rangaswami Iyengar, Mysore 1944) pp. 24-26: anumeye sattvam eva niścitam ... tad ekam rūpam pakşadharmatāsamjñakam / ... sapaksa eva sattvam niscitam ity anvayasamiñakam dvitiyam rūpam / ... tatra (=asapakse) asattvam eva niścitam vyatirekasamjñakam trtiyam rūpam / See my paper "Dignāga and Dharmakirti on apoha", Studies in the Buddhist Epistemological Tradition, ed. Steinkellner, Wien 1991, p. 140; see also Hayes,
Dignaga on the Interpretation of Signs, pp. 297-298. 10) In: Studies in Indian Philosophy, A Memorial Volume in Honour of Pundit
Sukhalji Sanghavi, L.D. Institute of Indology, Ahmedabad 1981, p. 79. 11) For the function of the particle eva, see Y. Kajiyama, "Three Kinds of Affir
mation and Two kinds of Negation in Buddhist Philosophy," Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, Band 17, 1973 and Brendan Gillon and Richard Hayes, "The Role of the Particle eva in (Logical) Quantification in Sanskrit," Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde Südasiens, Band 26, 1982. For Sanskrit fragment, see Het ubindu-Ţikā (ed. by Sukhlalji Sanghavi and
Shri Jinavijayaji, Gaekwad's Oriental Series CXIII, Baroda 1949) p. 18. 13) N.B.: N.Mukh does not contain such a definition of niyama or vyāpti. 14) NMukh k. 2: E RA ## ## # ### ==PS III. 9:
sa pakşe sann asan dvedhā pakşadharmaḥ punas tridhă / pratyekam asapkşe ca sadasaddvidhatvataḥ / (Quoted in the Nyāyavārttikatātparyaţikā ad NS 1. 1. 35 and PVA p. 580). NMukh (Taisho p. 1b): UA B Quoted in the Nyāyavārttika ad Nyāyasūtra 1.1.35: hetuħ tadābhāso vā prāyaḥ pakşadharma eva bhavati.
9)
5
12)
