Date of Kasyapahuda

Author(s): K R Chandra
Publisher: Z_Nirgranth_Aetihasik_Lekh_Samucchay_Part_1_002105.pdf and Nirgranth_Aetihasik_Lekh_Samucchay_Part_2

Page 1

The Date of Kasāyapāhuda
K. R. Chandra
The available canonical orāgama literature inherited by the Svetāmbara sect originally was composed in Ardhamāgadhī; whereas that of the Botika/ Ksapanaka of northern Indian and its derivative the Yāpaniya of Southern India had inherited the āgamas which were composed in Sauraseni. The surrogate or iso-āgamic works of the Digambara Church, too, had employed Sauraseni Prakrit. The earliest works of this pro-canonical literature are the Kasayapāhuda, the Satkhandāgama, and the works of Kundakundācārya. There is a general trend among the contemporary Digambara authors to place Gunadharācārya, the author of theKasāyapāhuda, earlier than Kundakundācārya, the author of the Samaya sāra, the Pravacanasāra, the Pañcâstikāya, and a number of other works.
In this article, the language of the Kasāyapāhuda and of the Pavayanapähuda olim Pravacanasāra is analysed with the view to finding out which work can be assigned an earlier date on the basis of the main linguistic characteristics.
Linguistic Data I Phonological Changes
Kasayapāhuda (=KP)
Pavayanasāra (=PS)
Number
Percentage
Number
Percentage
(i) medial -t
(including -to,-tā, -ti,-te,-tu)
=-t
O
0.80
84.8
560
94.63
=-d- 413 =-y- or -a- 74
15.2
29
4.57