Criticism Upon Modern Views of Over

Author(s): G C Jain
Publisher: Z_Kailashchandra_Shastri_Abhinandan_Granth_012048.pdf

Page 3

provide us proof of this concept that our earth is not only FLAT but also widely spread. Other most convincing proof in this regard is being put in the next section. Presence of Gravitational Forces in all Slanting Directions at our Earth
The bodies donot only fall vertically downward under the action of gravity but also roll down and slide down the inclined surfaces. For example, a vehicle roll down an inclined road by itself. At our earth, the bodies are seen to slide down and roll down no matter the inclination is small or large. It proves that our earth exerts its gravitational forces in all possible slanting directions. Whereas the modern earth is quite helpless in doing so. The contention can be illustrated by the diagram.
The diagram shows the modern earth and the Mount Everest which is nearly 8 km. high from the sea level. There is an inclined smooth surface with 20 inclination on the mount. A toy-car is allowed to roll down the inclined surface under the action of gravity. It can be seen that the gravitational forces which pull the toycar down the inclined surface donot enter the modern earth but run above and above its curvature. In such a case the required forces of gravity cannot be exerted by the modern earth. It is one example of absence of gravitational forces in slanting direction at the modern earth. Numerous cases of this kind can be put in this regard
Now just imagine that our earth is not only FLAT but also widely spread up in all four directions. In this case the gravitational forces can enter the earth from all slanting directions and from all heights. This is the justification for holding our earth both FLAT and WIDELY SPREAD UP IN ALL FOUR DIRECTIONS.
The learned readers are requested to consider the contention most carefully. I will be glad if some of them make me understand that in such and such manner the modern earth can possibly exert the gravitational forces required in my example,
Failure of Modern Science in Case of Moon.
Copernicus first thought that the earth is spherical and the moon revolves around it. Later on, Newton discovered a law named Newton's law of universal gravitation. He proved the idea of Copernicus about the moon by his law of gravitation. Two centuries later, Einstein came into picture. He criticised Newton's law of gravitation in several fields but he found nothing wrong in case of moon. Not only Einstein but Fred Hoyle also took it granted that the Newton's law well makes the moon a satellite of the spherical earth. This credit goes to the author of this essay that he worked out complicated mathematics in this regard and proved that the said law totally fails in making the moon a satellite of the earth.
I donot wish to annoy the readers by putting the mathematics which I worked out. The result in simple words is that the Newton's law of universal
- 448