Book Title: Comparative and Critical Study of Mantrashastra
Author(s): Mohanlal Bhagwandas Jhaveri, K V Abhayankar
Publisher: Sarabhai Manilal Nawab

Previous | Next

Page 357
________________ 348 INTRODUCTION duction. They could have atleast appended a note about Pt. Premiji's latest and considered views. EXAMINATION OF MR. PATEL'S VIEWS We are surprised however, to see the same unhistorical Bhaktāmaracaritra being relied on in fixing the date of Subhacandrācārya by Mr. Gopaldas Jivabhai Patel in his Introduction to 'Yogaśāstra', which purports to be a free rendering by him in Gujarāti of the original Yogaśāstra. Relying on the said work he takes Subhacandracārya to be a brother of the famous King Bhoja whose date he takes to be 1078 Vikrama era. He ascribes the same date to Subhacandrā. cārya and consequently considers him to be about 70 or 80 years older than Hemacandrācārya. Starting with such incorrect assumption Mr. Patel compares their respective works. Although he notes that Yogaśāstra is a concise and systematic work and that Jñanārnava is a work written in the loose style of a religious discourse, he credulously says that there is greater reason to suppose that Yogaśāstra was composed by systematizing and abridging Jñānārņava. We are inclined to think that if Mr. Patel had minutely compared both the works or if he had realised the unhistorical nature of Bhaktāmaracaritra he would have probably come to a different conclusion. He himself has felt doubts about his own conclusions and he has expressed the same in his Introduction. He also says that Hemacandrācārya, having been surrounded by many enemies, always ready to denounce him, could not have dared to commit such plagiarism. He has however not been able to free himself from the tangle of Bhaktamaracaritra, and has landed himself in an inextricable hole, when he hazards the conjecture of a very large portion of Yogaśāstra viz. chs. V to XI being interpolation by some unknown and unnamed overzealous pupil of Hemacandrācārya with the object of enhancing the glory of his great Guru. He does not assign any reason for his conjecture except that Hemacandrācārya himself could not have been guilty of devoting disproportionately a large portion of his work to the

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 ... 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635