Book Title: Assimilation Of Conjuct Consonants In Prakrit And Greek
Author(s): Haripriya Mishra
Publisher: Z_Jain_Vidya_evam_Prakrit_014026_HR.pdf

Previous | Next

Page 2
________________ जैनविद्या एवं प्राकृत : अन्तरशास्त्रीय अध्ययन e.g. Skt. yukta > Pkt. jutta Skt. dugd ha > Pkt. duddha Skt. ud gama > Pkt. ug gama Similar phenomenon is also noteworthy in Old Greek where in a combination of plosive + plosive the second prevails i, e. d/t+p> pp. e.g. Gk ho p pos < *hod. pos In a combination of mute +-nasal, mute prevails in Prakrit and nasal is assimilated. i. e. g+n> gg, ghtn > ggh etc. e.g. Skt. agniḥ > Pkt. aggi Skt. orghna > Pkt. viggha But Greek does not agree with Prakrit in this respect, because in case of mute+nasal, nasal prevails in Greek and the plosive becomes a class nasal. i.e. pb/ph-tm > mm e.g. grāmma (<-ph-m-) and bn > mn e.g. amnos (<*abnos) and gn < gn (written gn) e.g. gignomai (<* gignomai) In case of a combination of mute+l, mute prevails and 1 is assimilated in Pkt. e.g. Skt. valkala > Pkt. vakkala · Skt. al pa > Pkt. appa But Greek shows the reverse example of this principle. In Greek in a combination of plosive + liquid, liquid prevails. i. e. dl > ll in Greek. e. g. helli'< *sedla In a combination of mute and sibilant when sibilant comes first it is assimilated and the mute is aspirated in Prakrit. i. e. st <th. e. g. asti > atthi. But when the sibilant follows the mute they become cch. i. e. ts <cch, ps > cch etc. e.g. Skt vatsa < Pkt vaccha Skt mat sara > Pkt macchara परिसंवाद.४ Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only www.jainelibrary.org

Loading...

Page Navigation
1 2 3 4