Page Text
________________
श्रीनशासन (246वाडीs)
वर्ष:१५
:२१
ता.२५-3-२००
O
of
Menu
betwee two contending partis. The defendants "What the Digambaris have secured by the (Shwet imbaris) are doing the things complained Judgement as the Privy Council, above refered of undir authority of the decisions of the Civil to is only a right of worship of the temple on Court a. also of the Privy Council. Those decisions according to the time table of 1905 and no further. must st ind until they are set aside in accordance Any interferance by Digambaris in the with la'v and till they are set aside, the dispute is management of the temple by the Shwetambartes between-more challengers of claimants on the one
be that Management by necessary alterations and hand ard persons whose rights have been up held
improvements in the temple of it's property or by by the cecree of the highest tribunal on the other"
construction of further structures of the temple शिरपूर गाँव में पुरातन दो जैन मंदिर हैं। दोनों
land would amount to an unlawful action the part ही अंतरिक्ष पार्श्वनाथ नाम से जाने जाते हैं। यह गलत
of Digambaris." है सुप्रीम कोर्ट पान नं. 14
(पेढ़ी को हटाने संबंध में) "he trail Court found that the Pawali मी. ज्यु.के.नं.63/1941 temple is not known as Shri Antariksha
"The learned Judge observes that the Prippy Parshwinath"
Council decree granted a declaration only in 35 पिवी काउँसिल ने बहुत सारी चीजें कही हैं।।
favour of Shwetambaris do far as the right to the इसलिये ज्यादा खुलासा न करते हुये नीचे लिखी कुछ
exclusive management of the temple and image चीजें अपके सामने रख रहा हूँ
is concerned and if there is any modification of "Ibstract of Judgement of the Privy
clarification made by the Privy Council it was only Counci"
with respect to the Digambaris right of worship." "Broadly the findings are in favour of | आखिरी में आपसे यह बताना चाहूंगा कि कोर्ट Shwetanbaries. They had all along been in actual | ने फर्स्ट अपील नं. 287/44 में कहा किmanagement of the temple and Idol, their title and
"The Digambaris appeared to the me have right of management had been exclusive and they
been generally litigating for the sake of litigathon had be 'n worshiping the image with jewels,
and there is no reason why they should not play orname its and paintings. The main organ of the
the costs of other side if the decision goes agaist deity being covered with waist tie and band for a
them." period, which could not be definately asertained, । मुझे विश्वास है कि मेरा यह खुलासा कोर्ट के but at any rate from 1847-48 the Digambaris had | जजमेंट पर आधारित है, इसलिये अधिक भाष्य करता . also bei n allowed to worship in their own way in the tem vle. But the witnesses of the Digambaries,
(साकरचंद्र शहा) on the point of ownership of the temple and it's | मैनेजिंग ट्रस्टी, अंतरिक्ष पार्श्वनाथ संस्थान, शिरपुर management were not believed."
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On full consideration of the whole case,
युवक महासंघ चुनाव सम्पन्न their Lordships have reached to the conclusion that
'श्री जैन श्वेताम्बर मूर्तिपूजक युवक!* the deci ee is right and in the result therefore the
महासंघ, दिल्ली' का चुनाव विगत २४ नवम्बर, appeal fails and their Lordships will humbly
२००२ को दिल्ली के किनारी बाजार में सम्पन्न advicet is majesty that it be dismissed with costs."
हुआ। इसमें सर्वसम्मति से श्री नितिन दूगड़व भी। दिगंबर संप्रदाय को प्रिवी काउँसिल के जजमेंट
दीपक जैन को संयोजक चुना गया। से क्या मिला? क्रि.अ.नं ३६१/३६
kkkkkk
।
*
| SR No. | 537267 |
| Book Title | Jain Shasan 2002 2003 Book 15 Ank 01 to 21 |
| Original Sutra Author | N/A |
| Author | Premchand Meghji Gudhka, Hemendrakumar Mansukhlal Shah, Sureshchandra Kirchand Sheth, Panachand Pada |
| Publisher | Mahavir Shasan Prkashan Mandir |
| Publication Year | 2002 |
| Total Pages | 342 |
| Language | Gujarati |
| Classification | Magazine, India_Jain Shasan, & India |
| File Size | 20 MB |