________________
12
ARPITA G. PATEL
SAMBODHI
would get tarnished if the poet uses figures of speech. Only natural graceful description is enough as seen in this verse. No artificiality through simile or metaphor can achieve this task. (12) 3416417417941 arra. (Ku. Sam. 2/10). V. J.3/11 :While discussing अलङ्कारो न रसवत् V. J. 3/11-i.e. रसवत् अलङ्कार is not possible, K. quotes this verse, while discussing SOST, K. holds that in this verse tra and करणत्व are seen in one and the same object, as Lord Siva is both करण and कर्म of the activity, viz. arra'. Similar is the case with a fel. Thus for K. one and the same object can be both out and on at a time and this is seen in the verse quoted here. (13) prokutafa. (Ku. Sam. 8/62). V. J. 3/29 :K. quotes this verse to illustrate sufarsrullen figure. (14) fremgu. (Ku. Sam. 5/16;) V. J. 3/33. and; (15) ya Sh. (Ku. Sam. 4/44) V. J. 3/33 :These two verses are quoted under V. J. 3/33. The first one illustrates ufigfa figure, where spots are changed. The second illustrates change in qualities ETHEREach, acc. to K. (16) 374. (Ku. Sam. 1/31). V. J. 3/41 :This verse is quoted by K. while discussing the figure of speech fyrah the natural other worldly beauty is described by the poet in this verse by avoiding artificial methods. V : Dhananjaya/Dhanika - (D.R.) quote at eighteen places from the Ku. Saṁ. Such as :(1) và (4H. (Ku. Sam. 6/63). D.R. 2/14 : In the anlah on D.R. 2/14. The Zf4afya called 'sitaref' is illustrated through this verse. (2) 26 ufraai. (Ku. Saṁ. 8/2) :(3) Hantaq ayy. (Ku. Saṁ. 5/85). D.R. 2/16 :Under 2/16, in the familia, the varieties of the heroine are discussed. YTETT fach is illustrated in Ku. Saṁ. - 8/2. This verse also serves to explain pied - nervousness of the heroine under D.R. 3facio 4/54. To explain the varieties of
