Jain Journal 1998 04

SR No.: 520130
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Jain Bhawan Publication
Publisher: Jain Bhawan Publication
Publication Year: 1998
Total Pages: 39
Language: English
Classification: Magazine, India_Jain Journal, & India
File Size: 3 MB

Page 16

106
JAIN JOURNAL: Vol-XXXII, No. 4 April 1998
10. Fallacies of homogeneous examples
The Fallacy of example (dṛṣṭāntābhāsa) may arise in the homogeneous or heterogeneous form, from a defect in the middle term (hetu) or major term (sādhya) or both, or from doubt about them.
Fallacies of the homogeneous example (sādharmya-dṛṣṭāntābhāsa) are follows:
1) Inference is invalid (major term), because it is a source of knowledge (middle term), like perception (homogeneous example).
Here the example involves a defect in the major term (sādhya), for perception is not invalid.
2) Perception is invalid (major term), because it is a source of valid knowledge (middle term), like a dream (homogeneous example).
Here the example involves a defect in the middle term (hetu) for the dream is not a source of valid knowledge.
3) The omniscient being is not existent (major term), because he is not apprehended by the senses (middle term), like a jar (homogeneous example).
Here the example involves a defect in both the major and middle terms (sādhya and hetu), for the jar is both existent and apprehended by the senses.
4) This person is devoid of passions (major term), because he is mortal (middle term), like the man in the street (homogeneous example).
Here the example involves doubt as to the validity of the major term, for it is doubtful whether the man in the street is devoid of passions.
5) This person is mortal (major term), because he is full of passions (middle term), like the man in the street (homogeneous example). Here the example involves doubt as to the validity of the middle term, for it is doubtful whether the man in the street is devoid of passions.
6) This person is non-omniscient (major term), because he is full of passions (middle term), like the man in the street (homogeneous example).
Here the example involves doubt as to the validity of both the major and middle terms, for it is doubtful whether the man in the street is full of passions and non-omniscient.