________________
IRTTIKHYNUPRIKA
Some forma of the Passive base are : hirudi (320), jāyadi ( 40 ), jayade ( 332 ), nihappae ( 36 ), thwrxdi (19), bhirndijai ( 36 ), sampaigai ( 5 ); dijjai, bhuminjujaii ( 12 ). Of the calabal base : kūrayadi ( 832 ).
Some typical forms of the Present participle are: khajjarta ( 41 ), ginhanhto ( 136 ), klajjamand ( 42 ), wraccomadina (337), miyamina ( 25 ). Very often the Past p. p. forma are corruptions of Sanskrit forms: modda ( 321 ), dinna ( 366 ), bhayo (27), padida (24), paricatta ( 262 ), samitattha (385). Potential participle : bhaiyarias ( 388 ), muniyazova ( 899 ). Of the Germd the typical forms are : uthitta ( 874), Jānitia ( 20 ), sunichautā ( 297 ) catänan ( 255 ), jaiana (878), jāpiāna (3), piceridunak (40, 284 ), also datthuna ( 58 ); cattai ( 374 ), kiccă ( 356 ), thiccā ( 355 ); janiya ( 73 ), todega (202), lahiya ( 800), parivajjiya ( 156 ).
The author is also in the habit of using dest roots: chanda (29,77), jhada (378), dhukka (52), toda (202), vaddhara (17) etc.
The Sanskrit inheritance and influence loom large in the Kattig. not only in forme like annw (240), wwwdira (439), püsuya (305), micoura (24), miyamāram ( 25 ), sarannida (328), etc., but also in expressions like woevamodi (414), tadanantaran (108), punaransi ( 47, 454), etc. There is at least one onge of the use of dual a noted above. Some of the compo expressions have a positive ring of classical Sanskrit ( 404, 448 eto.).
Here and there some Apabhraṁsa tendencies are noted: the presence of u in punio (, 424, 444) and in the Nom sing, forma rayonu (297), laddra (351), both nouns in neuter gender; Instru, sing. in z or evil, texascemabhive ( 48), dharmē (320); Present 3rd p.pl, forms: exrcala njahi ( 48 v. l.), virala possuirahim, bhārahi (279). Further words like ubhao ( 355 ), kema ( 473), vikkanams (347) are less frequent in Prakrit.
If we study these details in the light of my observations on the Prakrit dialeot of the Proricanastir, it is safer to call the dialeot of Kattig. also Jaina Sauraseni. As contrasted with the dialect of the Pravacaricksāra, some points are conspicuous: i) the dialect of Katlig. show more inclination towards dropping of intersocalic consonants (including & and d) and of changing the aspirates (including dh) into h; ii) the Sanskrit influence is more patent; iii) and some striking Apabhrambu forms are noticed here and there, in the Kattigeyanuppekkha.
1) Two other forme dehi (19) dheni (16) noted by W. DENBOKH ( Pestgab. 8. Jacobi. Boon 1926, p. 166) are not confirmed by our text. They have wrisen from wrong reading of Devanagari-di ahi,