Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
(32) **Gadastisamuccaya** Not this way, because it is not possible to say that the **Samarthyayoga** is **avachy** (indescribable) which is associated with **Pratibhajnana** (intuitive knowledge) and is the means for **Sarvajnatva** (omniscience) etc. 8 //
**Meaning:** This is not the case, because the **Samarthyayoga** which is associated with **Pratibhajnana** cannot be described as **avachy** (indescribable), as it is the means for **Sarvajnatva** (omniscience) etc.
**Commentary:** Someone might say, "Well, if **siddhi** (liberation) is achieved through **shastra** (scripture) alone, what is the problem?" The answer is given here: "Brother, that is not the case. If **siddhi** were achieved through **shastra** alone, what problem would we have? What is more obvious than the direct contradiction? What is more crude than that? But it does not appear to be so, there is a contradiction in direct evidence. Because indirect knowledge of **agipana** (non-attachment) comes from **shastra**, but no one becomes truly **agipana** through it. This is because **agipana** and **kevalapana** (omniscience) are not achieved through **shastra** alone, but through **siddhi** (liberation). And because this is the case, the **Samarthyayoga** which is associated with **Pratibhajnana** (intuitive knowledge) and is **marganusari** (according to the path) and **prakrusht** (excellent) is **avachy** (indescribable). It is **samarthyapradhan** (powerful) and **yog** (practice). This is because the **kshayapashreni** (series of destruction) of **dharmavyapar** (religious activity) continues. This **Samarthyayoga** is **avachy** (indescribable), it cannot be described, it is **sanvedanasiddha** (experienced through the senses) and **atmanubhavgamya** (understandable through self-experience) for the **yogi** (practitioner). It is the means for **sarveshwasaadhan** (all-pervasive means) and **sarvajnatva** (omniscience) etc. It leads to **sarvottapana** (highest liberation) without delay.
**Doubt:** Someone might doubt, "This **Pratibhajnana** (intuitive knowledge) is also **shrautjnana** (scriptural knowledge)." No, it is not **shrautjnana**, because it is a different kind of knowledge. And it is not **keval** (omniscience), because it is the result of **samayoga** (coincidence).
**Conclusion:** The **siddhi** (liberation) is achieved through **shastra** (scripture) alone. This is not **shrautjnana** (scriptural knowledge), nor **keval** (omniscience), nor any other kind of knowledge. It is like the night, day, and dawn. Dawn is not different from night and day, nor is it one of the two. Similarly, this **Pratibhajnana** (intuitive knowledge) is not one of the two, nor is it one of the two. Because of the **utkrusht** (excellent) **kshayapashma** (destruction of karma) at that moment, it is **asambavyavaharya** (incomprehensible) in terms of **shrautjnana** (scriptural knowledge). And because of the **kshayopashma** (destruction of karma), it is not **keval** (omniscience) because it is not the subject of **ashesh** (all) **dravya-paryaya** (categories of matter). And this **Pratibhajnana** (intuitive knowledge) is **vachya** (describable) through words like **tarakjnana** (liberating knowledge) and **nirikshanjnana** (observational knowledge). It is also **ishta** (desirable) for others. Therefore, it is **adosh** (faultless).