Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
## Translation:
**Verse 35:**
**Meaning:** If this renunciation of attachment is about the subject of renunciation, about exceptions, about conduct or determination, or about knowledge or action, then it is not called knowledge-infused detachment.
**Verse 36:**
**Meaning:** All Nayas are true in their own context, and meaningless (false) in considering another's perspective. Thus, until there is a middle ground in all Nayas, it should be understood that there is no knowledge-infused detachment.
**Verse 37:**
**Meaning:** Just as the number one hundred is included in the number of the other half, similarly, if there is no skill in including (reducing) the subjects of other darshanas in the Swagam (Jain Agamas), then it should be considered that there is no knowledge-infused detachment in that practitioner.
**Verse 38:**
**Meaning:** If there is no skill in applying the meanings of the Agamas and the logical ones in their respective places, then there is no knowledge-infused detachment.
**Chapter Six**
**65**