Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
**Meaning:** This verse states the origin of the religions of the soul, which is the special recipient of the Nay. They are not without manifestation (non-manifestation) due to the covering, nor are they without manifestation due to the absence of the soul's dharma. What is the proof of this? ||14||
**Meaning:** Sattva (substance) is not suitable in any way for the parasantaana (lineage of others), and since the santani (descendants) are impermanent, the santana (lineage) is also not dhruva (permanent). Just as in the birth of a son from a father, the cause of the father in the past leads to the effect of the son in the future, there is an absence of fatherhood and sonship before this. In this way, as fatherhood is destroyed through tradition, so too is sonship destroyed. Similarly, the tradition of the birth and destruction of the soul from parasantaana, that is, from the non-self (inert pudgala) other than itself, continues in various times. That is, from the flow of birth, there is an absence (destruction) of the past and the birth (existence) of the future. According to this, the destruction of the past and then the future will be proven, and the soul will become impermanent and perishable. However, the cause of sattva (substance) in the form of parasantaana is not justified in any way. Just as in the tradition of the thread, the right of the earth-like substance is the eighteenth...