________________
304 EPIGRAPHIA INDICA
[VOL. XXXII 12 D&vami Salakhū Lakshmir=Uttama ch=ēti tasya tu dharmma-patnyaḥ pitfivyasya
obatasrah pati-dévatāḥ || 13 | kritir=iyam srimad-ācārya-N[@] .....1 13 věḥ brf-Padmanabhasya | utkirņn=ēyam Pamạita-Yasõdhara-putrēņa Jayatasimhēna
Bathvat 1234 Chaltra-budi 4 [l*) ) sivam=astusthöyāch=ch=aita ... ...!
1 The last of the lost syllables was apparently ka which appears to have been preceded by the word putranya. The name of the poet's father was probably written only in two syllables, the first of which was ne. This name may have been something like Nema.
*The damaged senteneo may be conjecturally restored as sthéyachach-aitut-kirttir-a-chandr-arkam.
