________________
No. 34.)
THE LARGER LEIDEN PLATES OF RAJARAJA I.
243
Fifth Plate ; Second Side. 100 Kaţăh-adhipatës-tasya níyögāt-Tuvavüravan [*] Anukka iti vikhyātas-brimão
Atikal--ātmajaḥ 1[43*) OL 101 Vinito guņa-sampannas=svāmi karya-hitỏ rataḥ [1] sākanam tähvatam-idam=achikarad
udāra-dhiḥ [44] OL 102 Rājarāja-mahācharyyo Vāsudēv-āpar-ābvayah [*] a-krishna-charitaḥ Kpi103 shņa-sambhavõ=pi mahāmatiḥ [45*) Sriramga-Damodara-nāmadhēyau Krishn
atma104 jau Krishna-pad-ābja-bhrimgau [*] Krishn-ābhidhāno=pi cha Vāsude105 Va-barirajo niraja-chāru-nētraḥ [46] Arāvampita-putras-cha Purusho106 ttama-sa[m*]jñitaḥ [*] sparddhamāno=kshara-nyasē Chitraguptēna chitraguḥ
||[47*] 107 Hovy-anyavāya-tilakāḥ Kāñchipura-samutbhavāh. (*) prašastim=ēnām=ali108 khan pañch-aitē chitrakāriņaḥ [48*] 1-ésāsanam veţținom Jayankon[da]60109 la-maņdalattu sri-Kāñchipurattu oviya-chchitrakäri Krishộan Väsudēvan-äņa
Rājarāja-ppe110 rāchāryyaņēpum Krishnan Tiruvaranganum Krishnan Dämõdiranum Väsudēvan
Krishnanum 111 Arávamirdu "Purushottam'apnum! || 61 116
Tamf Portion.
Pirst Plate; First Side. 1 Svasti sri [l*] 6. Könēriņmaikondan Kshatriyasikhāmaņi-valanāţto2 pPattana-kkūrrattu nättärkkum brahmadêya-kkilavarkkum dēvadāna-ppalli3 chchanda-kkani-murrüttu-vettappērt-ūrgaļilārkkum nagarangalilārkkum 4 namakku yandu irubatt-oprāvadu nal tonnürr-irandinal B Tañjāvũreppurambadi maligai Räjäsrayanil tepkkil mandabat6 tu nām irukka=kKidāratt-araiyan Chūlāmaņipanman Kshatriyasikha7 maņi-vaļanāțţu=pPattana-kküfrattu Nägapattanattu eduppikkiora Chūļā8 manipanma-vibārattuppaļļikku vēndum nivandattukku Kshatrisya"]sikhāmaņi-va9 lanăţțu=pPattana-kkūrrattu Anaimangalam pallichchandam irangal=uļpada ala10 ndapadi ningal nikki nilap toņņürr-ēlēy-irandu-mă mukkāņiy=araikka
1 Abhikala is the reading given in Volume IV of Archæological Survey of South India. As the letter bh is quite differently shaped from there is no doubt that the proper name here given is briman Afika (Adikal) and not Abhikala.
. Read samudbhavih. * The reading given in the A. 8. of 8. I., Vol. IV, p. 208 is Aravamirtuvum. The additional vum is clearly mistake. There is no trace of it in the plate. If vum is retained, there would be six names, but there must be only five for it is stated in line 108 parich-aitt chitralarinal. Moreover, what is required is a double name like Krishnan Yaoudēvan, eto, in which the first component indioates the name of the father In fact we have it stated in verne 47, that this individual's name was Purushottama and that he was the son of Aniawita.
• The letter puis corrected frona pi. . Read mapum.
• The reading of A. 8. of 8. I., Vol. IV, (p. 208, 1. 114) ia murrurwd. It is evidently a mistake. The plato ends only murit which is also found in other inscriptions