Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
The study of scriptures should not lead to anger. This is said because even when someone is extremely agitated and provoked, believing it to be in their own best interest, a virtuous person should not be angry, let alone someone else. Similarly, when a householder is being disciplined according to the rules of conduct for householders, even if they are being told that what they are doing is not appropriate for householders, they should not be angry. Even if they are being provoked by their own mind, believing that this is for their own good, they should not let their mind be corrupted. ||8||
This is the meaning of the commentary: After explaining the discipline given by virtuous people on their own side, the author of the sutras speaks about the discipline given by both those on their own side and those on the other side. Those who are opposed to the teachings of the scriptures are called "viruddhotthapena utthita". These include those who are against the teachings, householders, and those with false beliefs. When a virtuous person makes a mistake due to carelessness, they should be guided by a virtuous person of their own time, according to the teachings accepted by them. They should be told that their scriptures do not prescribe the rituals and conduct they are engaging in. Or, if a virtuous person who has fallen from restraint is trying to guide another virtuous person who is slipping in their observance of vows, they should guide them according to the teachings of the Tirthankaras, based on the principles of the original and subsequent qualities. They should quote the scriptures and say that actions like running fast are not permitted or approved by the scriptures. Similarly, if a person with false beliefs, whether younger or older, sees a virtuous person engaging in disgraceful, inauspicious, or condemned conduct, they should guide them towards righteous conduct. Here, the word "tu" refers to a person of the same age, who should also guide them. If someone sees another person engaging in extremely inappropriate actions and tries to guide them, or if a servant, being very eager to do their duty, is very insistent in trying to get someone to stop doing inappropriate and trivial things, even a maid, water-carrier, or servant should guide them towards righteous conduct. The virtuous person should not be angry. The point is that even if a maid, seeing someone engaging in unrighteous conduct, becomes extremely angry and guides them towards righteous conduct, the virtuous person should not be angry, considering it to be in their own best interest. Then, what to speak of being angry when someone else gives them advice? If a householder is being disciplined according to the rules of conduct for householders, or according to the traditions of their time, and they are told that what they are doing is not appropriate for householders, even if they are being told this with disdain, they should not be angry. They should understand that this is for their own good and not let any negativity arise in their mind. This is further explained as follows:
"They should not be angry, nor should they be distressed, nor should they speak harshly. They should promise to do so, knowing that this is for their own good, and not be careless." ||9||
Commentary: "Tesh" refers to those who are on their own side or the other side, who are trying to guide them. They should not be angry, believing it to be in their own best interest. Nor should they be angry when someone else speaks harshly to them. They should think:
"When someone is angry, their mind should be directed towards understanding the truth. If it is true, why be angry? If it is false, why be angry?" ||1||
575