________________
Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra
www.kobatirth.org
Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir
૪૧૬
poses of issues no. 1 and 2. With regard to the third issue the defendant no. I is proved to bave taken Diksha of her own free will. That the defendant no. 2 therefore cannot be said to obstruct her in going to her husband of the Sansar. The plaintiff relies greatly of the evidence of Laxmi'as, but Laxmidas makes it clear that when the plaintiff spoke to him about the matter he at once helped hini and as soon as the real truth came to him that the matter of theft and the pretence of Diksha were merely twined by the plaintiff. He at once refused his help. Witness Laxmidas tells the whole truth and so the plaintiffs allegation is wrong. Thus no relief can be given as against the defendant no. 2.
The result is that the plaintiff suit stands dismissed. The defendants being ascetics and having renounced the world and not having asked for costs I do not think it necessary to allow the costs and the plaintiff has only to bear his own costs of the suit.
Sd. MAGANLAL P, MEITA
13-1-31 Compared by (990HI HA)
13-1-31 V. J. MODY. True Copy (904i 2?)
સી કક્કો
આ ચૂકાદા ઉપર મજકુર ધરમચદે ત્યાંની હાઈર્કોર્ટને અપીલ કરી, તેમાં પણ હાઈકોટે નીચલી કોર્ટને તે જ ચૂકાદો કાયમ રાખ્યા હતા. આથી હાઈકોર્ટના ચુકાદા ઉપર તપાસ કરવા માટે હજુરને અરજી કરી છે હતી, જે કાઢી નાંખી હતી.
For Private and Personal Use Only
