________________
Shri Mahavir Jain Aradhana Kendra
www.kobatirth.org
Acharya Shri Kailassagarsuri Gyanmandir
wife to jail. The Porbandar law was changed and the old law was restored to meet the contingencies of ignorant and law caste, women, who taking advantage of the law left their husbands for other worldly motives and no jail can be inflicted on a person whose religion makes her civil death and who has renounced the marriage tie. Adoption of relijiours order is x x x x x to civil death so as to complete severence of connection with the relations. Thus the Hindu law does not in any way go against the Diksha and the arguments that even if Diksha is proved the Hindu law allows the right of the husband is untenable.
Thus the real quostion in the case is whether the Diksha is proved. The defendant no. 1 gives a complete detail of the ceremonies that were performed at the Baleg Jain temple and she has taken all the Mahavratas and cannot touch even a male Baby. Her vows are life-long and she can do nothing or touch nothing that savours of Sansar. Pandit Lalchand states that the worldly life is at an end on taking these vows. She is leading the life of an ascetic to the Jain order. The plaintiffs' case is that no permission of the plaintiff was given that no Varghoda was made that there was no Guru and that the Diksha was not takan in a forest. With rogard to the permission the plaintiff was never willing and is not willing to grant his permission and the sutras on the points state that when a person is inclimed to renounce the world if the relations do not consent the permission is unnecessary. This is clear from the sacred books of the east and from the original of Sughdhang and
For Private and Personal Use Only
