________________
(
458
)
Colophon:
इति श्रीपरमहंसपरिव्राजकाचार्याभयानन्द-पूज्यपादशिष्येण भगवतानन्दपूर्णमुनीन्द्रेण विद्यासागरापरनामधेयेन विरचिते टीकारत्ने समन्वयसूत्रविरतिः समाप्ता ।
शिवमस्तु । Post-colophon :
संवत् १४६१ वर्षे आखाड़ मुदि गुदिने श्रीमत्कायावाराहाणश्रीमत्परमहंसपरिव्राजकाचार्यवर्यधुर्य श्री (the name is blurred over with ink)-नानुग्रहौतेन केनचि++++
++++निमा परोपकारार्थ खार्थं च आभ्यंतरनागरज्ञातीयमहं
वासुदेवसुतगोयालयादिव+सागय ॥ पुस्तकमिदं लिखापितं ॥ . So it is an elaborate discussion on the first four sūtras of the Brahmasūtra ; being a commentary on a commentary on some Bhāsya of the Brahmasūtra.
In the concluding verse, it mentions Mahābaladeva, who cannot be taken for Baladeva Vidyābhūşaņa, the commentator of Govindabhāsya. The date of the MS. itself repudiates the idea. For, it is said, he wrote the "commentary at the request of Gajapati, who was made pure and peaceful by the favour of Sri Caitanya (see C.S., III, 567). To hazard a conjecture, it may be a commentary on Pañcapădikā-Vivarana. That also concerns itself with the first four sūtras of the Brahmasútra, following Sarkara's Bhāsya.
8218. 547. विवरणप्रमेयसंग्रह Vivaranaprameyasamgraha For the MS. see L. 1433.
It is not by Govindānanda as Rājendralāla says. His commentary entitled Ratnaprabhā has been several times printed. Rajendralala's statement misled Aufrecht, who attributed L. 1433 to Govindānanda. Aufrecht in another place attributes Vivaranopanyāsa to Rāmānanda Sarasvati on the authority of Rice, Ben(?) and Bik. But none of them support him.
The present MS. is without the author's name.
