Bruhat Katha kosha

SR No.: 016060
Original Sutra Author: Harishen Acharya
Publisher: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan
Publication Year: 1943
Total Pages: 566
Language: Prakrit, Sanskrit
Classification: Dictionary & Dictionary
File Size: 16 MB

Page 61

BRHAT-KATHAKOŠA
cases it is hard even spot the proper names. A story from the Diṭṭhivaya has been summarised (M. 512-520), but the crucial names are not properly indicated. To illustrate how different Parisahas or hardships, of which we get an account in the Uttaradhyayana, chap. II (M. 484), were endured by the ascetic heroes of the past, various names are mentioned; but the text gives very few biographical details (M. 485-503 etc.).
This bird's-eye-view of the narrative sections from the Ardhamāgadhi canon reveals to us certain broad traits. The legends are associated mainly with three Tirthakaras, Nemi, Parsva and Mahavira: the majority with Mahavira and minimum with Pārsva. In all the legends connected with Nemi, Kṛṣṇa Vasudeva figures quite prominently; and they get closely linked with what we call Harivamsa. The tales belonging to the age of Mahāvīra give good many details about contemporary dynasties and kings. Though they are didactic in spirit, it is quite apparent that some characters are historical persons. As remarked above, some legends are specifically Jaina, while some are special editions of common Indian legends with ethico-religious bias of Jainism.
30
Some evidence is preserved in the canon itself as to how these pattern-stories etc. were kept in traditional memory. Almost all of them stand at present in prose, but in some places the series of names are put in the form of a verse. Further Uvāsagadasão gives a few verses which must have served a good aid to memory of the teachers who gave the stories in details when the occasion arose. The commentaries on the texts like the Nayadhammakahão give pithy verses summarising and explaining the motive of the stories. It is difficult to say whether these verses are the later summaries of the present texts or the texts themselves have such verses at their basis. Though the first alternative is not altogether excluded, I feel inclined to accept the second alternative as a general rule. The entire narrative of the Samaraic cakahā was presented by Haribhadra on the basis of a few verses which too have come down to us. Such verses do presuppose stories in oral tradition, but they themselves lie at the basis of the written compositions available at present.
b) POST AND PRO-CANONICAL STRATA ETC.
The next stratum of Jaina literature, which deserves special attention in the survey of early narrative tale, is represented by Nijjuttis1 that are something like commentaries which not only explain a few topics connected with the text with which they are associated by the application (ni-yuj) of Anuyoga-dvaras etc. but also supplement the information
1 On the Niryuktis the following sources may be studied. Leumann: Daśavaikālikasutra and Niryukti, ZDMG, 46, pp. 581-663, and Übersicht über die Avasyaka-Literature, Hamburg 1934; Ghatage: The Daśavaikälika-, and Sūtrakṛtänga-niryukti, Indian H. Quarterly, vol. XI, 4 and vol. XII 2; Charpentier: Intro.. pp. 48-52, of Uttaradhyayana, Uppsala 1922; Chatura vijayaji: Anekanta 111, pp. 678-684.