________________
28
Sumati-Jnāna
Cousens was carried out successfully by the Public work department and an amount of Rs. 1, 855 only spend for the purpose.''
A. H. Longhurst, officiating Superintendent, Archaeological Survey Eastern Circle visited this temple in January 1908 and recommended some structural works to the temple like large crack over the doorframe should be filled in, sikhara above the upper Iron band and the amalaka is to be re-fixed and water tightened, on the north side where the old stone and new work join, repair are necessary as the brick work is showing sign of decay and far from being watertight, the window like opening high up over the entrance should be wired up.20 In the next year these works were also attended carefully.
M. H. Kurashi, Assistant Superintendent, Archaeological Survey, Central Circle inspected the temple site on 10th March 1926. He was of the opinion that the west face of the temple walls seems to have been rebuilt in later times with rough stone slabs and chips in lime, and the same masonry has been used in the repairs of the large platform in front.21
At present, the Raipur Circle of Archaeological Survey of India is looking after the preservation, maintenance and upkeep of this magnificent temple.
REFERENCES 1. Raipur District Gazetteer (1973) p. 534. 2. Nigam L.S. (1997) Dakshin kosala ka Etihasik Bhogol, p. 62. 3. Archaeological Survey of India Report 1873-74 (1994) p. 162. 4. Raipur District Gazetteer (1973) p. 535. 5. Dikshit M. G. (1954) Madhyapradesh ke puratatva ki ruprekha, p. 106. 6. Raipur District Gazetteer (1973) p.534. 7. Shri Muni Kanti Sagar (1953) khandaharo ka Baibhava, p. 352. 8. Archaeological Survey of India Report 1873-74 (1994) p. 162. 9. Manwani S.N.(1988) Evolution of Art and Architecture in central India, p. 101. 10. Archaeological Survey of India Report 1873-74 (1994) p. 161 and Longhurst A. H. (1908) Conservation note on the Ancient Monuments in the Raipur District, C. P. p. 8. 11. Misra R. N. (1987) Sculptures of dahala and Dakshina kosala and their background, a note by Dr. V. K Nayak as appendix III- p. 158. 12. Archaeological Survey of India Report 1873-74 (1994) p. 162. 13. Indian Archaeology A Review (1984-85), Architectural Survey, p. 185. 14. Indian Archaeology A Review (1984-85), Architectural Survey, p. 185. 15. Shri Muni Kanti Sagar (1953) khandaharo ka Baibhava, p. 150. 16. R. K. Sharma, S. K. Sullere and C. S. Gupta (ed) (19...) Kalachuri Rajvansa aur unka yug, Vol. II Sthaplya avam Murtikala, p. 341. 17. Archaeological Survey of India Report 1873-74 (1994), p. 159-165. 18. Progress Report of the Archaeological Survey of Western India (1904), p. 23. 19. Longhurst A. H. (1908) Conservation note on the Ancient Monuments in the Raipur District, C. P., p.
20. Ibid. 21. M. H. Kuraishi (1926) Inspection note on the Bhand Dewal temple at Arang, Raipur District, C. P.,
n 1-2 Jain Education International For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org