________________
KAMAYOGIN.
We
administian
No oligar e to be cone flyt body Moderate opinion, presentation no MOR bonitation procedo governed annot tonia to sucrifa. But Watchword of Amecione constitu- by other and that hent choice here alwo things are willing to submit tipoal gitation is the sighteenth wad dagrotlon ? Westemorument the question to the arbitrument of centary, # Nodonterol, bo to be programire a tational or faly alected Congo, though co-operation should be the watak Onservato a iet parce
they refuse to recogniso close and word of our lawful agitation--for sittis, policy and spirit # There were limited Subjects Committee the coqutitution we have noar in the the rual inter.' The Nationali final authority. It will be no twentieth. We sum up this refusal party stood for democmey, copetita therefore that the real question of co-operation in the convenientsionalism, and program.
pre t he
The throughout is constitutional. The word "Boyoott", refusal of oo Moderato party, governed by an
body which at present calls itself aporation in the industrial exaggeratod respect for old and the Congress, bw adopted a consta exploitation of our country, in esteemed leaders, holped, without
tution which is clono, exclusive, erducation, in government, in judi- clearly understanding what they undemocratic and so framod as to oial administration, in the details did, those who stood for oligarohy,
limit the free election of delegates of official intercounte. Necessarily, arbitrary procedure and an almoet by the people. It limita itself by we have not made that rofanal of reactionary conservation. Personal proposing & number of articles of Go-operation complete and uncom- idiosyncracios, preferences, aversion faith in a particular form of words promising, but we hold it as a settled like a thick cloud over the to every intending delegato before method to be enlarged and pushed contest, the combatanta on both sides he can take his seat; it aims at the farther according the necessity fung themselves on every point of
election of delegates only by select for moral pressure becomes greater difference material or immaterial na bodies and sociations instead of and more urgent. This is one aspect - pretext or a weapon, the tactics of
the direct election of the people; it of the policy. Another is the necus- party warfare were freely used and, excuses many from the chances of wity of boycott to help our own finally, the deliberate obstipacy of a election and gives them an undue nascent energies in the field of self- fuw Modernte leaders in avoiding weight in the disposal of the affairs help. Boycott of foreign goode is a discussion of the points of difference of the assembly. These and similar ncccssary condition for the encount- and the unruly ardour of the young- provisions no democratic party can gement of Swadeshi industries, er men on both sidue led to the
accept. A Nationalist Confor. boycott of Government schools is a violent scenes At Surnt and the ence or a Moderate Convention arcenary condition for the growth break-up of the Congress. If the may so guard its integrity, but the of national oducation, boycott of question is ever to be settled to the Congress is and must be a National British courts is a necessary condi- advantage of national progress, the Assembly admitting froely all who tion for the spread of arbitration. personal and minor differences must Are duly elected by the people. "The only question is the extent be banished from the field and the The proposed pusing of this mr. and conditions of the boycott and real insties plainly and dispersion- actionary constitution by a body that must be determined by the ately considered,
already limited under its provisions circunstances of the particular pro- The questions of particular im- will not cure the constitutional halem in each case. The genern! portanco which divido the parties, defect. It is only a Congress electspirit of passive resistance has first are the exact forin of Swaraj ed on the old lines that can deterto be raised, afterwards it can be to be hold forward as an ideal, the mine the future provisions for it organierd, regulated and, where policy of passive resistance and the constitution and procedure with any necessary, limited.
form of certain resolutions. The hope of universal accrptance. The first obstacle to our evolution lust in a question to be decided It is not therefore by any mani is the internal dispute which has | by the Congress itself and all that pulation of the Convention Congr' for the moment wrocked the the Nationalists . derpand in that that a solution of the problem can be Congress and left in its place the discussion shall not bo burked and brought about, but by the Provinhollow and mutilatod simulacrum of that they shall not be debarrod cial Conferencis empowering the
National Assembly which mot from their constitutional right of lenders of both parties to meet in laut your at Madras and, deprived placing their views before the Committee and provide for an though it is of the support of the National Assembly. On the other arrangeinent which will hul diffir. not eminent local lenders, parpones points, they cannot acrifice their ences and enable tho Congress to tu meet again at Lahore. It is a idoul or their policy, but their work smoothly and freely in the grievous error to suppose that this contention is that these differences fature. If there is a uninority who dispute hung only on personal quos- ought not in a free deliberative refuse to associate themselvus with tions and difference of a trifting Assembly to stand in the way of any such attempt, the majority will inportance. As happens inevitably in united progress. The Swaraj be justified by the mandate of the such popular conteste, personal quen-matter can easily be settled Ly the Provinces in disregarding them and tions and differences of minor im- substitution of " full and compet meeting to carry out the popular portance intervened to perplex and self-government for "self-govern-wish. Once the lines are settled urabitter the strife, but the real ques- ment on Colonial lines" in they can be submitted to the froo tiops in debate were those which in the Swaraj resolution. The differ- choice of a freely-elected Congrom rolyod the whole future development 1000 as to passivo resistanco hinges for acceptaneg, rejection or werlifica
shoppirit and form of pelf-govera- at present on the Boycott resolution tion. This will retoro a Congrid men in this systry. Were that I which the Nationalist party and on sound spinstitutional liaise wi.
3
.