________________
: 466 :
Jinabhadra Gani's
[The tenth
indriyas, and the existence of which has already been established by means of anumānas and other evidences. This soul has already by accepted by Vāyubhūti † as more nitya than dravya on account of its power of remembering its (previous) existence etc. You too, shall have to accept its nityatva, so that the fault of exclusive nityatva alleged by you does not arise. ॥ 408 ॥ ( 1956)
And, न य एगो सवगओ निकिरिओ लक्खणाइभेआओ। कुंभादउ व बहवो पडिवज्ज तर्मिदभूइ व ॥ ४०९ ॥ (१९५७) Na ya ego savvagao nikkirio lakkhanāibheão i Kumbhādau vva baliavo padivajja tamindabhūi vva 1140911 (1957) [न चैकः सर्वगतो निष्क्रियो लक्षणादिभेदात् ।।
कुम्भादय इव बहवः प्रतिपद्यस्व तदिन्द्रभूतिरिव ।। ४०९ ॥ (१९५७) Na caikaḥ sarvagato nişkriyo lakṣaṇadibhedát | Kumbhādaya iva bahavaḥ pratipadyasva tadinadribhūtiriva 11409||
Trans.-409 It is neither one, nor all-pervading, nor inactive. Like Indrabhūti, believe it as many (in number) like ghata etc. by reason of various characteristics. ( 1957)
टीका-न चास्माभिरेक आत्मेष्यते, किन्तु बहवः-अनन्ताः। कुतः ?। लक्षणभेदात् । उपयोगलक्षणो हि जीवः, स चोपयोगो राग-द्वेष-कषायविषयाध्यवसायादिभिर्भिद्यमान उपाधिभेदादानन्त्यं प्रतिपद्यत इत्यनन्ता जीवाः, लक्षणभेदात् , घटादिवदिति । तथा, न सर्वगत आत्मा, किन्तु शरीरमात्रव्यापकः, तत्रैव तद्गुणोपलब्धेरित्यादिशब्दोपात्तो हेतुः, स्पर्शनवदिति दृष्टान्तश्च । एवं न निष्क्रिय आत्मा, भोक्तृत्वात् , देवदत्तवदिति । तदेतदिन्द्रभूतिप्रथमगणधरवत् प्रतिपद्यस्वेति ॥ ४०९ ॥ (१९५७)
D. C.-According to us, Soul is not one, but infinite in † Vide Chap III
