Gandharwad

SR No.: 011044
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Ratnaprabhvijay, D P Thaker
Publisher: Jain Granth Prakashak Sabha
Publication Year: 1942
Total Pages: 579
Language: English
Classification: Book_English
File Size: 63 MB

Page 275

Jinabhadra Gani's
[ घटसत्ता घटधर्मस्ततोऽनन्यः पटादितो भिन्नः ।
अस्तीति तेन भणिते को घट एवेति नियमोऽयम् ? ॥१७४॥ (१७२२)
-: 282 :
[ The fourth
Ghaṭasatta ghaṭadharmastato'nanyah patadito bhinnaḥ Astiti tena bhanite ko ghata eveti niyamo 'yam ? ॥174|| (1722) ]
Trans.—174 Existence of ghata is a property of ghata. So, ( it is ) non-separable ( from ghata ) ( and ) distinct from pata etc. By saying, therefore, that “It exists how could you frame a rule that there exists ghata alone ? ( 1722 )
""
टीका - घटास्तित्वलक्षणा घटसत्ता घटस्य धर्मः, स च ततो घटादनन्योऽभिन्नः, पटादिभ्यस्तु सर्वेभ्योऽपि भिन्नः । तेन ततो " घटोऽस्ति " इति भणिते 'घट एव ' इति " घट एवास्ति " इति कोऽयं नियम :निज निजसत्ताया: पटादिष्वपि भावात् तेऽपि सन्त्येवेति भावः ॥ ९७४ ॥ ( १७२२ ) ॥
D. C.-Astitva is the property of ghata and hence it is non-separable from ghata but distinct from objects like puta etc. So, when it is said that “ ghata exists " you cannot assert that ghata alone exists. For, the property of astitva is present in objects like pata also and hence they too are existing.
जं वा जदत्थि तं तं घडो त्ति सवघडयापसंगो को । भणिए घोत्थि व कहं सवत्थित्तावरोहो त्ति ? ॥१७५॥ (१७२३)
Jam va jadatthi tam tam ghado tti savvaghaḍayāpasango ko | Bhanie ghadotthi va kahams avvatthittāvaroho tti? u175u (1723)
[ यद्वा यदस्ति तत्तद् घट इति सर्वघटताप्रसङ्गः कः ।
भणिते घटोsस्ति वा कथं सर्वास्तित्वावरोध इति ? || १७५ || (१७२३) Yadva yadasti tattad ghata iti sarvaghatataprasangaḥ kaḥ Bhanite ghato'sti vā katham sarvāstitvāvarodha iti ? ॥175॥ ( 1728) ]
Trans.- 175 Or, by saying that whatever exists is ghata, how would the occasion of all being ghata arise? Or, by