________________
Vada ]
Gañadharavada
: 207 :
Moreover, पच्चक्खओऽणुमाणादागमओ वा पसिद्धिरत्थाणं । सवप्पमाणविसयाभावे किह संसओ जुत्तो ? ॥१५१॥ (१६९९) Paccakkhao'numānādāgamao vā pasiddhiratthānām i Savvappamāņavisayābhāve kiha samsao jutto ? u 15111 ( 1699)
[प्रत्यक्षतोऽनुमानादागमतो वा प्रसिद्धिरर्थानाम् ।
सर्वप्रमाणविषयाभावे कथं संशयो युक्तः ? ॥ १५१ ॥ ( १६९९ ) Pratyakşato’numānādāgamato vā prasiddhirarthānām i Sarvapramāņavisayābhāve katham samsayo yuktah ? 1115111 (1699)]
____Trans.-151 The accomplishment of objects is (attained) either by ( means of ) visible evidence (pratyaksa ) or by inference ( anumāna ) or by documentary evidence ( agama ). ( But ) in absence of all ( such ) Prananas ( evidences ) and visayas ( topics ) how could the samśaya be justified ? ( 1699 )
टीका-यदा हि प्रमाणैरर्थानां प्रसिद्धिर्जाता भवेत् तदा कथश्चित् क्वचिद् वस्तुनि संशयो युज्यते । यदा च सर्वेषां प्रमाणानां सर्वेषां च तद्विषयाणामभावस्तदा कथं संशयोऽस्तु, संशयस्य ज्ञात-ज्ञेयाद्यर्थसामग्रीजन्यत्वात् १ । सर्वशून्यत्वे च तदभावाद् न संशयोद्भूतिः, निर्मूलत्वादिति भावः ॥१५१॥ (१६९९)॥
D. C.-When the object is accomplished by means of pramānas ( evidences ) a doubt may arise in several objects to a certain extent. But when all such pramānas and visayas are absent, how can the doubt exist? The doubt springs up from materials like znātā and jieya. But when everything is believed as s'ünya, materials like jñātā and jieyc are not supposed to exist, and hence, the sams'aya has also no reason to rise. जं संसयादउ नाणपज्जया तं च नेयसंबद्धं । सबन्नेयाभावे न संसओ तेण ते जुत्तो ॥ १५२ ॥ (१७००)