________________
Vada ]
vai sa-s'arîsya priyâpriyayo r-apahatirasti, a-s'arîram vâ vasantam priyâpriye na sprs'ataḥ." And that is the reason why you have raised this doubt.
The doubt is refuted as follows:
पत्तेयमभावाओ न रेणुतेल्लं व समुदये चेया ।
मज्जसु तु मओ वीसुं पि न सङ्घसो नत्थि ॥ १०४ ॥ ( १६५२ ) भमि धणि वितण्हयाई पत्तेयं पि हु जहा मयंगेसु । तह जइ भूएसु भवे चेया तो समुदये होज्जा ॥१०५॥ (१६५३)
Gaṇadharavada
.: 145:
Patteyamabhāvão na renutellam va samudaye ceyā Majjarigesu tu mao visum pi na savvaso natthi ॥ 104 ॥ ( 1652 )
Bhami-dhani-vitaṇhayaî patteyam pi hu jahā mayangesu Taha jai bhūesu bhave ceyā to samudaye hojjā || 105 | ( 1653 )
[ प्रत्येकमभावाद् न रेणुतैलमिव समुदये चेतना |
माङ्गेषु तु मदो विष्वगपि न सर्वशो नास्ति ॥ १०४ ॥ (१६५२) भ्रमि-भ्राणि - वितृष्णतादयः प्रत्येकमपि खलु यथा मदाङ्गेषु ।
तथा यदि भूतेषु भवेच्चेतना ततः समुदये भवेत् ।। १०५ ॥ (१६५३)
Pratyekamabhavad na reṇutailamiva samudaye cetana Madyāngeşu tu mado visvagapi na sarvaśo nāsti || 104 ॥ (1652) Bhrami-dhrani-vitriṣnatadayaḥ pratye kamapi khalu yatha madangeșu Tatha yadi bhūtesu bhaveccetana tatah samudaye bhavet || 105 (1653 )
Trans.-104-105 Consciousness (cetana) can never exist in a collection if it is absent in case of (its) individual constituents, just as oil cannot be found in a collection of sands if it is not present in each individual particle of the sand. Again, intoxication (mada) is not absolutely absent even in an individual constituent of wine. (For), every constituent (of wine) possesses some capacity or other like that of inducing
19
