________________
* 114 :
Jinabhadra Gani's [ The second [अथ मतमसिद्धमेतत् परिणामादिति सोऽपि कार्यात् ।
सिद्धः परिणामस्तस्य दधिपरिणामादिव पयसः ॥ ८० ॥ (१६२८) Atha matamasiddhauetat pariņāmāditi so’pi kāryāt i Siddha) pariņāmastasya dadhipariņāmādiva payasaḥ || 80 (1628 ]
Trans.-80 Again ( the opponent will say ) this (i.e. Karmarūpatva) could not be accomplished by ( virtue of) the hetu that it undergoes change. ( But ) even that is due to Karya. Just as the mutability of milk is established by the mutability of curds, its mutability could ( also ) be established ( by that of Karya ). ( 1628)
टीका-अथ 'परिणामित्वात्' इत्यसिद्धोऽयं हेतुरिति मतं भवतः । एतदप्ययुक्तम् , यतः सोऽपि परिणामः सिद्धः कर्मणः, 'कजाउ त्ति' कर्मकार्यस्य शरीरादेः परिणामित्वदर्शनादित्यर्थः । इह यस्य कार्य परिणाम्युपलभ्यते तस्यात्मनोऽपि परिणामित्वं निश्चीयते, यथा दध्नस्तकादिभावेन परिणामात् पयसोऽपि परिणामित्वं विज्ञायत एवेति ॥ ८० ॥ (१६२८)
D. C.-Again, you would believe that Kurman is asiddha by reason of its parināma. But that is not proper. The parināmituri of Karman is apprehended from the parināmitva of its Kūryus like Sarîru etc. For, when the effect is mutable, mutability of the action is automatically recognized, just as the mutability of milk is recognized from the pariņāma of its Karya viz, curds, in the form of butter-milk.
Agnibhūti asks :अब्भादिविगाराणं जह वेचित्तं विणा वि कम्मेण । तह जइ संसारीणं हवेज को नाम तो दोसो ? ॥८१॥ (१६२९) Abbhādivigārānam jaha vecittani viņā vi kammeņa i Taha jai sainsārîņam havejja ko nāma to doso ? 11 81 ( 1629 ) [ अभ्रादिविकाराणां यथा वैचित्र्यं विनापि कर्मणा ।
तथा यदि संसारिणां भवेत् को नाम ततो दोषः ? ॥ ८१॥ (१६२९)