Jaina Logic

SR No.: 011020
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: T G Kalghatgi
Publisher: Raja Krisen Jain Charitable Trust New Delhi
Publication Year: 1981
Total Pages: 111
Language: English
Classification: Book_English
File Size: 4 MB

Page 83

Jaina Logic
Ramanuja etc.) the Jaina view must also be relative. To deny this conclusion would be to admit, at least, one absolute truth; and to admit it would leave the doctrine with no settled view of reality, and thus turn it into a variety of scepticism."""
62
But it may be pointed out that the conditions of doubt are not present in this assertion. For instance, a man sees a tree in the dusk and doubts whether it is a man or a branchless tree. This is due to the lack of determination between the specific features of the object as the perception is faulty. But in the case of the seven-fold presentation the attributes of existence and non-existence are each defined by their specific determinations. The condition of these determinations makes doubt impossible.
It is said that the sevenfold predication, of the Jainas is beset with contradictions Affirmation and denial of the attribute in the same object is not logically possible It would be a self-contradiction In this context we may refer to the criticism of Samkara and Rāmānuja. Samkara's criticism can be analysed into three stages. I) he tries to point out the intrinsic impossibility of the predication because of the inherent contradictions involved in it. Mutually contradictory and conflicting attributes cannot exist together. But if we take into consideration the different contexts referred to, we may say that the contradictions can be easily reconciled. In experience we get examples of co-existing conflicting attributes. For instance, the branches may be in motion but the tree does not move. The same individual may be father in relation to X and son in relation to Y. 2) He points out the futility of the doctrine because the doctrine is indefinite The unlimited assertion that all things are of non-exclusive nature gives indefinite assertion like syad asti and syad nasti Hence a man who holds such a doctrine of indefinite context does not deserve to be listened to any more than a drunken man or a mad man.
134. Hiriyanna : The Essentials of Indian Philosophy (Allen Unwin) 1949
pp. 69