Ratnakarandaka Shravakachara

SR No.: 010669
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Jugalkishor Mukhtar
Publisher: Manikchand Digambar Jain Granthamala Samiti
Publication Year: 1982
Total Pages: 456
Language: Hindi, Sanskrit
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 7 MB

Page 72

___तथाप्तमीमांसायां व्यासतः समर्थितत्वात् ।' 'यथा चाभावैकान्तादिपक्षा न्यक्षेण प्रतिक्षिप्ता देवागमाप्तमीमांसायां तथैह प्रतिपत्तव्या इत्यलमिह विस्तरेण ।'
-युक्त्यनुशासनटीको । 'इत्यादिरूपेण कृष्णादिषड्लेश्यालक्षणं गोमदृशास्त्रादौ विस्तरेण भणितमास्ते तदन नोच्यते ।'
-पंचास्तिकायटीका जयसेनीया । ऐसी हालतमें, विना किसी प्रबल प्रमाणकी उपलब्धिके, उक्त वाक्य मात्रसे यह नतीजा नहीं निकाला जा सकता कि यह टीका और उक्त दोनों ग्रंथ एक ही व्यक्तिके बनाये हुए हैं।
इस टीकामें एक स्थानपर-वरोपलिप्सया' पद्यके नीचे ये वाक्य पाये जाते हैं
"नन्वेवं श्रावकादीनां शासनदेवतापूजाविधानादिकं सम्यग्दर्शनम्लानताहेतुः प्राप्नोतीति चेत् एवमेव यदि वरोपलिप्सया कुर्यात् । यदा तु शासनसक्तदेवतास्वेन तासां तत्करोति तदा न म्लानताहेतुः । तत् कुर्वतश्च दर्शनपक्षपाताद्वरमयाचितमपि ताः प्रयच्छन्त्येव । तदकरणे चेष्टदेवताविशेषात् फलप्राप्तिनिर्वि.. नतो झटिति न सिद्धयति । न हि चक्रवर्तिपरिवारापूजने सेवकानां चक्रवर्तिनः सकाशात् तथा फलप्राप्तिदृष्टा ।"
टीकाके इस अंशको लेकर दूसरे कुछ विद्वानोंका खयाल है कि यह टीका उन प्रभाचंद्राचार्यको बनाई हुई नहीं हो सकती जो प्रमेयकमलमार्तण्डादिक ग्रंथोंके प्रणेता हैं। उनकी रायमें, इन वाक्योंद्वारा जो यह प्रतिपादन किया गया है कि 'रागद्वेषसे मलिन शासन देवताओंका पूजनविधानादिक उस हालतमें सम्यग्दर्शनकी मलिनताका-उसमें दोष उत्पन्न करनेका-हेतु नहीं होता जब कि वह विना किसी वरकी इच्छाके केवल उन्हें शासनभक्त देवता समझकर किया जाता है;' और साथ ही, यह बतलाया गया है कि वे शासनदेवता, दर्शनमें पक्षपात रखने-जैनधर्मके पक्षपाती होने के कारण उन पूजनादिक करनेवाले श्रावकोंको विना माँगे भी वर देते ही हैं, और यदि उनका . पूजनादिक नहीं किया जाता किन्तु इष्ट देवताविशेष (अर्हन्तादिक ) का ही पूजनादिक किया जाता है तो उस पूजनादिकसे इष्टदेवताविशेषके द्वारा शीघ्र ही निर्विघ्न रूपसे किसी फलकी सिद्धि उसी प्रकार नहीं हो पाती जिस प्रकार कि चक्रवर्तीके परिवारका पूजन न करने पर चक्रवर्तिके पाससे सेवकोंको फलकी प्राप्ति नहीं

Translation AI Generated

"And because it is supported by Vyasa in _Tathāptamīmāṃsā_." "Just as the arguments of the _Abhāvaikānta_ and other sides are refuted by the _Devāgamāptamīmāṃsā_ in a straightforward manner, so too should they be understood here. There is no need for further elaboration."
- _Yuktyanuśāsanatīkā_ . "And so on, the characteristics of Krishna and the other six _leśyā_ are explained in detail in the scriptures like _Gomata_ etc. That is not being said here."
- _Pañcāstikāyatīkā_ by Jayasenīya. In this situation, without the availability of any strong evidence, it cannot be concluded from the said statement alone that this commentary and the said both texts are created by the same person.
In this commentary, at one place, below the verse " _Varopaplipsyā_ ", these sentences are found:
"Now, if it is said that the worship of the _śāsanadevatā_ etc. by the _śrāvakas_ etc. would lead to the defilement of _samyagdarsana_ , then it is so if it is done with the desire for a boon. But when it is done to them as _śāsana-sakta-devatā_ , then it is not a cause of defilement. And those who do it, due to their partiality towards _darsana_ , even grant boons that are not requested. And if it is not done, then the attainment of fruit from the special _iṣṭadevatā_ (like _arhanta_ etc.) is not quickly and effortlessly achieved. For, it is not seen that the servants of a _cakravartī_ obtain fruit from the _cakravartī_ when they do not worship his family."
Regarding this part of the commentary, some other scholars believe that this commentary cannot be written by Prabhācandracārya, who is the author of _Prameyaka-malamārtaṇḍa_ etc. In their opinion, the statement made by these sentences that "the worship of the _śāsanadevatā_ etc. who are defiled by _rāga-dveṣa_ does not lead to the defilement of _samyagdarsana_ - it does not cause any defect in it - when it is done without any desire for a boon, simply considering them as _śāsana-bhakta-devatā_ "; and also, it has been stated that those _śāsanadevatā_ , due to their partiality towards _darsana_ - being partial to Jainism - grant boons to those _śrāvakas_ etc. who worship them even without being asked, and if they are not worshipped but the special _iṣṭadevatā_ (like _arhanta_ etc.) are worshipped, then the attainment of fruit from the special _iṣṭadevatā_ through that worship is not achieved quickly and effortlessly in the same way as the servants do not obtain fruit from the _cakravartī_ when they do not worship his family.