Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
148
Swami Samantabhadra.
470 years after the birth of King Vikrama - not the commencement of his Samvat - and for this, they present the following verse from the second Prakrit lineage of the Nandisingha:
A
Santari chasadatto tinakala vikamo havi jammo. Athavarasa balalila sodasavasehi bhammiye dese || 18 ||
According to their view, when Vikrama was 18 years old, 488 years and 5 months after the Nirvan of the Veer, the Vikrama Samvat commenced, and this is the Samvat of Vikrama's reign. Shriyut Babu Kashi Prasadji Jaiswal, Barrister-at-Law, Patna, and Master Bihari Lalji Buland - Shahari, support this view, and Dr. Herman Jacobi also seems to hold the same opinion*. In the lineage of the Nandisingha also
1 This lineage is also printed in the 4th Kiran of the Jain Siddhanta Bhaskar. 2 This verse is also found in the 'Vikram-Prabandh', (Jain Si. Bha., Kiran 4th, p. 75.)
*This is known from the following excerpt from a letter written by Dr. Herman Jacobi recently, while sending the book 'Bhagwan Mahavira', and this excerpt was printed by Shri Kamta Prasadji in the December 1924 issue of 'Veer'.
In the 32nd chapter you show that according to Digambara tradition, the Nirvâna of Mahavira took place 470 before Vikrama. Now I found in Gurvavali from Jaipur that Vikrama's birth occurred 470 years after Mahavira's Nirvana Sattari chadusadajutto tinakala vikkamo havi jammo. But the Vikrama era does not date from the janma of Vikrama, but from the rajya of Vikrama, or from the 18th year after his birth. By this reckoning the Nirvana should be placed 18 years earlier or 545 B. C.