Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
Time-Decision.
He passed away in 135 and 587 AD. Therefore, Dr. Satishchandra, in his book 'History of Medieval Justice', has considered Siddhasena to be a scholar around 533 AD, and in the preface of Nyayavtar, around 550 AD, and regarding the Vikramaditya of Ujjaini, he has accepted the opinion of those scholars who have equated Vikramaditya* with King Yashodharmadeva of Malwa, who, according to Al-Biruni, defeated the Huns at Korur in 533 AD. In such a situation, it is clear that Siddhasena Diwakar was not a scholar of the first century of Vikram, but a scholar of his sixth century or the fifth and sixth centuries AD. In this regard, Muni Jinavijayaji writes on page 82 of Jain Sahitya Sanshodhak, second issue,
"Siddhasena has passed away long before the 6th century AD. Because Acharya Mallavadi, who happened in the fifth century of Vikram, had written a commentary on Siddhasena's Sammatitarka. In our opinion, Siddhasena happened in the first century of Vikram."
Saptaakshivedasankhyam shakalamamasya chaitrasukladaau.
Ardhastamiate bhanaryavanpure saumydivasadye || 8 || . 1 See Vincent Smith's 'Early History of India', 3rd edition, p. 305. * There have been many kings who have held this title of 'Vikramaditya'. Chandragupta II and Skandagupta of the Gupta dynasty were particularly famous as 'Vikramaditya'. It is found from past investigations that the famous scholar named 'Kalidasa' - who is considered one of the nine gems of Vikramaditya's court - lived in the fifth century AD, during the reign of these kings and their intervening Kumaragupta (Vincent Smith's Early History of India, 3rd edition,