Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
English Translation (preserving Jain terms):
Verse 58]
Section on Transference of Ownership-Determination
351
40. Samittam (Ownership). 41. Whose is the transference of the utmost anubhaga (intensity) of mithyatva (false belief)? 42. 'The transference of the utmost anubhaga is of one who has bound the utmost anubhaga and has gone beyond the bandhavalī (series of karmas). 43. Thus for all karmas. 44. But the transference of the utmost anubhaga of samyaktva (right belief) and samyagmithyatva (mixed right and wrong belief) is whose? 45. Of one who has destroyed the darsanamohaniya (deluding karma that obscures right faith) and has the remaining karma.
46. Then, the lowest. 47. Who is the one in whom the transference of the lowest anubhaga of mithyatva occurs? Churni Sutra - Now they explain the ownership of the transference of the utmost anubhaga. 40. Question - Whose is the transference of the utmost anubhaga of mithyatva? 41.
Answer - The transference of the utmost anubhaga is of one who has bound the utmost anubhaga and has gone beyond the bandhavalī, i.e., of any one living being. 42.
Special meaning - The living being who has bound the utmost anubhaga of mithyatva with intense affliction, after the bandhavalī, is found to have the transference of the utmost anubhaga of his mithyatva. Such a living being is an extremely afflicted, utmost mithyadrsti (wrong believer) of the class of samjni (conscious) pancendriya (five-sensed). Here, it should be particularly known that this transference of the utmost anubhaga is not found in tiryanc (animals) and humans with asankhyata (innumerable) years of lifespan, and in devas (celestial beings).
Churni Sutra - Similarly, the ownership of all karmas should be known like that of the mithyatva-karma. The only specialty is: Whose is the transference of the utmost anubhaga of samyaktva-prakrti (right belief nature) and samyagmithyatva? It is of the one who has destroyed the darsanamohaniya and in whom there is remaining meritorious karma worthy of transference. 43-45.
Churni Sutra 10 - Now, further, they explain the ownership of the transference of the lowest anubhaga. 46. Because it is found in one who has destroyed the darsanamohaniya. The transference of the lowest anubhaga is either in the same place or in a different place; from the destruction of darsanamohaniya up to the utmost anubhaga, it is due to the absence of the lowest modification. Jaya. 1. Having bound the utmost, going beyond the bandhavalī, it transfers to the utmost. 52. Karma Anuyoga Sutra.
2. After going beyond the bandhavalī, in the first moment of bondage, is ownership given? No, because of the absence of the capability of transference, as the karma of the bandhavalī has not been removed. He, the mithyatva-utkarstanubhaga-bound, conscious, five-sensed, mithyadrsti, is completely afflicted. If thus the transference of the utkarstanubhaga does not occur anywhere, for the sake of avoiding doubt, a certain specialty is made, that it does not conflict with the arising of the darsanamohaniya-ksapaka (destroyer of deluding karma) and others. But in the asankhyata-varsika (with innumerable years of lifespan) tiryanc, manusya (human), and upapada (born in celestial abode) devas, the transference of the utkarstanubhaga does not occur, because of the impossibility of its occurrence there. By this, the transference of the utkarstanubhaga is also refuted in the samyagdrsti (right believers). Because, without the destruction caused by the binding of the utkarstanubhaga and going beyond the bandhavalī, the attainment of the qualities of samyaktva is not possible. How is this specialty established by the sutra? No, because it is known from the explanation, the more explicit sutra, and the appropriateness of that understanding.
Jaya. 3. Because, other than the destruction of darsanamohaniya, there is no destruction of their anubhaga. Even though it is said in general that one who has meritorious karma, yet, by the context, it should be understood that one who has meritorious karma worthy of transference, otherwise there would be the fault of over-generalization, even for one who has entered the bandhavalī and has meritorious karma.