________________
पुरुषार्थसिद्धयुपाय parigraha. It is not so because infatuation is instrumental in all external possessions (parigraha) as well.
एवमतिव्याप्तिः स्यात्परिग्रहस्येति चेद्भवेन्नैवं । यस्मादकषायाणां कर्मग्रहणे न मूर्छास्ति ॥
(114)
अन्वयार्थ - (एवम् ) इस प्रकार (परिग्रहस्य) परिग्रह की (अतिव्याप्तिः ) अतिव्याप्ति (स्यात् ) होगी (इति चेत् ) यदि ऐसा है तो ( एवं न भवेत् ) ऐसा नहीं हो सकता ( यस्मात् ) क्योंकि (अकषायाणां) कषाय रहित वीतराग मुनियों के (कर्मग्रहणे) कर्म के ग्रहण करने में (न मूर्छा अस्ति) मूर्छा नहीं है।
114. This may seem to be overlapping (possessing anything is infatuation). It is not so; when passionless (higher order) saints take in karmic molecules, there is no attachment, and, therefore, there is no infatuation.
The passionless saints have no attachment Āchārya Pujyapada's Sarvārthasiddhi:
The passionless person possessed of right faith, knowledge and conduct is free from delusion. Hence there is no infatuation in his case. Further, knowledge is not fit to be disregarded or cast off, and it is also the essential characteristic of the soul. So it is not infatuation. Desire etc. are fit to be cast off, as these are the effects of karmas and contrary to the nature of the soul. So infatuation in these is attachment. Infatuation or attachment is at the root of all evils. If a person has the idea of this is mine', he has to safeguard it. In
75
