________________
द्वितीयं लक्षणम्
(२९) लक्षणान्तरमाह
साध्यवद्भिन्नेति । साध्यवद्भिन्नो यः साध्याभाववान् तदवृत्तित्वमित्यर्थः । कपिसंयोगी एतद्वृक्षत्वादित्याद्यव्याप्यवृत्तिसाध्यकाव्याप्तिवारणाय साध्यवद्भिन्नेति साध्याभाववतो विशेषणमिति प्राञ्चः, तदसत्, 'साध्याभाववद्' इत्यस्य व्यर्थतापत्तेः साध्यवद्भिन्नावृत्तित्वम् इत्यस्यैव सम्यक्त्वात् ।
"
The second definition of Vyapti
(29) The author states the second definition of vyapti by the expression “that which is different from that which has that which is to be established". The meaning is the non-existence of reason in that which possesses the absence of that which is to be established and which is different from that which has that which is to be established. According to old logicions the expression 'that which is different from that which has that which is to be established' is the qualifier of the substratum of the absence of that which is to be established is used to avoid the too narrow application, in the inference; 'this has the conjunction of a monkey of this treeness because this is the inference' in which that which is to be established has partial existence. This is the opinion of old logicians. It is not correct because in this case the expression 'the substratum of the absence of that which is to be established' will be useless, because the non-existence in that which is different from that which has that which is to be established only would be the correct definition.
