Nyaya Pravesha Part 1

SR No.: 008423
Original Sutra Author: N/A
Author: Anandshankar B Dhruva
Publisher: Oriental Research Institute Vadodra
Publication Year: 1968
Total Pages: 228
Language: Sanskrit, English
Classification: Book_Devnagari & Philosophy
File Size: 5 MB

Page 181

57
न्या. प्र. द. यद्येवम् etc. Objection to the answer given above. If you are P.24, 1.1. prepared to include these two in उभयासिद्ध, why not include
संदिग्धासिद्ध sud आश्रयासिद्ध also in the other two, viz., उभयासिद्ध end न्या. प्र.. अन्यतरासिद्ध? For, all असिद्ध must be either one or the other of P. 24,1. 3. these. Moreover, such an opinion is actually held by some
who say: " असिद्धभेदौ द्वादेव द्वयोरन्यतरस्य च" न्या. प्र. वृ. ध सिद्धिo-Paijika explains धर्मिणोऽसिद्धिराश्रयासिद्धे; हेतोः संदेहश्च संदिग्धासिद्ध । P. 24, 1. 4. Here धर्मासिद्धि and हेतुसंदेह are features which require to be
emphasised and consequently the centras which they characterize, viz., आश्रयासिद्ध and संदिग्धासिद्ध are separately
mentioned and not included in the other two. न्या. प्र. वृ. एकान्ते भवः &c.--Panjika explains एकश्चासावन्तश्चैकान्तो निश्चयः, तत्रभवः P. 24,1. 6. स प्रयोजनमस्येति वा ऐकान्तिकः; तनिषेधेऽनैकान्तिकः (P. 57 b). प्रत्युदाहरणमेवेति
(Panj, P. 58 a, I. 1.) is a misprint for इत्युदाहरणमेवेति (see Vrtti
P.24 1. 8). न्या. प्र. वृ. द्वयोर्बहूनां वा-Thia gives the reason why it is called ' साधारण '. P.2411.9-10.
न्या. प्र. वृ. Read :-आहोस्विदनित्यस्य । अस्येति प्रस्तुतस्य शब्दस्य । श्रावणत्वमिति । एतदुक्तं भवति । P. 24. 1. 11. 1. 12. गम्यते--The reading of the Vrtti is साधारणः प्रमेयत्वान्नित्यः without
शब्दः before प्रमेयत्वात्. Therefore it is taken as understood. 1.18. अहो नायं संशयहेतु: The question discussed is whether a साधारणहेत्वाभास
is संशयहेतु. It is argued that it is not, because even before the हेतु is put forward there was संशय when the प्रतिज्ञा was stated
( एतत्प्रयोजनमन्तरेण प्रागेच संशयस्य भावात् ). न्या. प्र. वृ. For अहो Panjikā reads आह ( अत्राहेत्यादि)-Some one objects. P.2411.18,21
पञ्जिका For सद्भावस्या it reada तद्भावस्य = ( संशयभावस्य ). P.58a पत्रिका हेतावनुपन्यस्ते-It will be noticed that there are two संशयs----one P. 58 b. implied in the प्रतिज्ञा, what may be called मूलसंदेह, and the other
resulting from the अनेकान्तिक साधारण हेत्वाभास. It is the latter that
we here mean. 11.21-24. संदेहे पति Objection:-हेतु is put forward only when संदेह is there.
Answer : No.; afany does not always imply age. In the case of