________________
280
[P. 70, 1. 15
'ākāṣapadma' in Vol. II, p. 214, 1. 5, & I. 16 resp., and 'gaganaravinda' in Vol. II on p. 87, 1. 30.
NOTES
Kharavisāna', a horn of an ass, is another illustration of impossibility; for, no ass has horns. This phrase occurs on p. 91, 1. 18; p. 356, l. 17 and in Vol. II on p. 7, l. 15; p. 53, 1. 26; p. 55, l. 5; p. 86, L. 25; p. 96, l. 7; p. 99, 1. 30; p. 141, 1. 5; p. 214, 1. 25; and p. 215, 1. 21.
'S'as'a-visana' which is a synonym of 's'as'a-s'rniga' and which means 'a horn of a hare' occurs on p. 149, 1. 13 and in Vol. II on p. 80, 1. 12; p. 86, 11. 14-15. The word 'mrga-tṛṣṇika' meaning a mirage occurs in Vol. II on p. 76, 1. 30. For other details about it see p. 282.
The allegation made on p. 14, 11. 8-4 is here
P. 71, 11. 6-11. mentioned and refuted.
P. 71, 11. 12-13. This verse and the following three occur in S'astravārtāsamuccaya as v. 115-158 as quotations. They are explained in its svopajña com. (pp. 72b--73a), but the wording differs. These verses are attributed to Vṛddhas. See the intro. (p. XCIV). This reminds me of the following quotation occuring in Siddhasena Gani's com. (p. 377) on TS (V. 29):—
P. 71, 1 19.
" न नरः सिंहरूपत्वान्न सिंहो नररूपता । शब्दविज्ञान कार्याणां भेदाज्जात्यन्तरं हि तत् ॥”
P. 73, 1. 3. This is the same line as I. 10 of p. 15; but it is here used in a different context.
P. 73, I. 12. Vaiyadhikaranya' means the state of having different substrata. It is absense of a common abode, dislocation.
P. 74, 1. 7. Tantra' is a homonym. Here it is used in the sense of a system of philosophy'- Jainism. The word 'tantrantariya' occurs in the Bhasya (pp. 121, 232 and 354) on TS. Gandhahastin Siddhasena Gani explains it as on p. 121. The word 'sva-tantra' meaning 'Jainism' occurs on p. 175, 1. 19 and tantra' in Vol. II, p. 181, 1. 4 and p. 238, 1. 26. On p. 101, 1. 19 we come across the phrase 'tussisveg?.
P. 74, 1. 25. What works are meant by vṛddha-granthas' is not stated in the super-commentary. They may be some work or works of Siddhasena Divākara, Mallavadin or some such personage who is senior to Haribhadra.
P. 76, IL. 7-11. These lines are by way of refutation of the allegation made on p. 15, 11. 11-22. In the Notes (pp. 164-165) on SM, it is said:"When one knows an object (z), he distinguishes it from like as well as unlike objects (other clay vessels and also qe). Thus, in knowledge, there is a negative element in addition to the positive element. It is only with the help of the former, that we fix the nature of an object, which would otherwise remain nebulous, floating, vague, undefined. Therefore adatai manaत्मकं स्वरूपम् "