________________
(Vada Nihuavavāda
: 49: pradeśa should alone be called Jiva, because it makes the whole being complete in forin.
Tisyagupta misinterprets the ālāpaka in this way and gets hiinself confused. 41 (2336).
Then, गुरुणाऽभिहिओ जह ते पढमपएसो न संमओ जीयो। तो तप्परिणामो चिय जीवो कहमंतिमपएसो ? ॥४२॥२३३७॥ 42. Guruņā’bhihio jai te pad hamapaeso na sanmaö Jivo i
To tapparinamo cciya Jivo kahamantimapaeso ? 2337 [गुरुणाऽभिहितो यदि तव प्रथमप्रदेशो न संमतो जीवः । ततस्तत्परिणाम एष जीवः कथमन्तिमप्रदेशः ? ॥४२॥२३३७॥ 42. Guruna'bhihito yadi tava prathamapradeso na sammto Jivah |
Tatastatparināma eva Jivah kathamantimapradesah ? (2337)]
Trans. 42. He was told by the preceptor that “ If you do not take the first part (of a living being) to be Jiva, how could the last portion which happens to be of the same consequence as that of the first one, be called Jiva ? 2337.
टीका-४२ "एकोन्त्यप्रदेशो जीवः तद्भावभावित्वाज्जीवत्वस्य" इत्यादि ब्रुवाणस्तिष्यगुप्तो गुरुणा वसुसूरिणाऽभिहितः-हन्त ! यदि ते तव प्रथमो जीवप्रदेशो जीवो न संमतः, ततस्तन्तिमो जीवपदेशः कथं केन प्रकारेण जीव: ?न घटत एव सोऽपि जीव इत्यर्थः । कुतः १ तत्परिणाम इति कृत्वा । इदमुक्तं भवति-भवदभिमतोऽन्त्यप्रदेशोऽपि न जीवः, अन्यपदेशैस्तुल्यपरिणामत्वात् , प्रथमावन्यप्रदेशवदिति ॥२३३७।।
D. C. In reply to the belief of Tisyagupta that the last portion-and not the other portions-alone should be taken as Jiva, Ācārya Vasusuri explains :
"0 Tisyagupta, if you do not take the first part (of a living being) as Jiva, it is not worthy of you to take the last part also as Jiva. Because, the last portion is of the same pari
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
