________________
: 184: Jinabhadra Gani's
[The sixth ___Here there is another lifficulty also :--- अह अविमुको वि तओ नोजीवो तो पइप्पएसं ते । जीवम्मि असंखेजा नोजीवा नत्थि जीवो ते ॥१७५॥२४७०॥ 175. Aha avimukko vi taö no-jivo to paippresam te i
Jivammi asamkhejjā no-jivā natthi jīvo to. (2470) [अथाविमुक्तोऽपि सको नोजीवस्ततः प्रतिप्रदेशं ते। जीवेऽसंख्येया नोजीवा नास्ति जीवस्ते॥१७५॥२४७०॥ 175. Athavimukto'pi sako no-jivastatan pratipradesam te।
Jive'samkhyeyê no-jīvā nāsti jīvaste. (2470) ]
Trans. 175. And if Jiva is taken as no-jiva, in spite of its being unseparated (from its parts), then they, (no-jivas) would pervade every small atom, there would be innumerable no-jīvas in a jiva, and (ultimately) there would be nothing like jiva. 2470.
टीका-१७५ अथैतद्दोषभयाद् न जीवस्य च्छेदोऽभ्युपगम्यते, किन्त्वविमुक्तोऽप्यविच्छिनोऽपि जीवसंबद्धोऽपि तकोऽसौ जीवदेशो नोजीवस्त्वयेष्यते, यथा धर्मास्तिकायायेकदेशो नोधर्मास्तिकायादिः । ततस्तर्हि प्रतिप्रदेशं ते तव नोजीवसद्भावादेकैकस्मिन्नात्मन्यसंख्येया नोजीवाः प्राप्ताः, ततस्ते तव नास्ति कापि जीवसंभवः, सर्वेषामपि जीवानां प्रत्येकमसंख्येयनोजीवत्वमाप्तरिति ॥२४७०॥ D. C.
Rohagupta :--In order to prevent the difficulties mentioned before, you may not take jiva as lifferent from its sinall regions. But, just as a small part of Dharmāstikāya, which is not actually different from dharmāstikaya, is said to be no-dharınāstikāya (a slight predicament of dharmāstikaya ); what harm is there in taking a small 'region of jiva associated with jiva itself, as nojiva (or slightly animate )? .
___Acārya :--In that case, every small particle of the jiva being occupied by a number of no-jivas, there would be plenty of nojīvas in one single jīva. And as the entire soul will be pervaded
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
