________________
:98: Jinabhadra Gani's
[The fourth ____ Trans. 99 If your belief is based upon (the afore-said) rule, it is also laid down in the rule that an object is imperishable by (virtue of its ) form 2394.
टीका-९९ अर्थ पूर्वोक्तालापकरूपात् सूत्रात् सूत्रप्रामाण्यात् प्रतिसमयं सर्वथा वस्तूच्छेदः प्रतिपाद्यत इति तव मतिः । ननु यदि सूत्रं तव प्रमाणम् , तर्हि सूत्रे द्रव्यार्थतया शाश्वतमपि वस्त्वन्यत्रोक्तमेव, पर्यायार्थतयैव चाशाश्वतम् , तथा च सूत्रम्-"नेरइयाणं भंते ! किं सासया, असासया ? । गोयमा ! सिय सासया, सिय असासया। से केण?णं । गोयमा ! दव्बट्टयाए सासया, भावछायाए असासया" इति ॥२३९४॥
D.C. According to you, an, object should be taken as entirely perished at every moment on the authority of the rule referred to befores.
Now, if you take the sūtra as an authority on this point there is another sūtra also which describes an object as śāśvata or imperishable by virtue of its being matter, and vinaśvara or perishable by virtue of its form
The satra runs as follows :Q. “Neraiyāņam bhante ! kim sāsaya a-sāsayā ? A. Goyamā ! siya sāsayā, siya a-sāsaya..
5. Vide verse 2390.
6. The following ālāpaka is from Bhagvati Sūtra :Q.“ Neraiyā ņam bhante ! kim sāsayā a-sāsayā ? A. Goyamā ! siya sāsaya siya a-sāsayā. Q. Se kenatthenam bhante ! javaevam vuccai " Neraiya siya
sāsaya, siya a-sāsayā ? A. Goyamā! Avvocchitti nayatthāyāe sāsayā, vocchittinayatt ha
yae asasaya. Se tena-atthenam java siya sasaya siya a-sasayā.
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
