________________
[ The fourth
: 204 :
Jinabhadra Gani's
"Yavad driśyam parastāvad bhāgaḥ sa ca na driśyatè | Tana to nabhilapyā hi bhāvāḥ sarve svabhāvataḥ ||
"
So, you have a doubt in the existence of Bhūta etc., and according to your belief, they are non-existent. This finishes the purvapakṣa (the argument of the opponent).
Now follows the refutation of the argumentमा कुरु वियत्त ! संसयमसह न संसयसमुन्भवो जुत्तो । स्वकुसुम - खरसिंगेसु व, जुत्तो सो थाणु- पुरिसेनुं ॥ १४९ ॥ (१६९७) Mā kuru Viyatta ! samsayamasai na samsayasamubbhavo jutto Khakusuma-kharasingèsu va jutto so thāņu-purisèsu. 149 (1697)
[ मा कुरु व्यक्त ! संशयमसति न संशयसमुद्भवो युक्तः ।
खकुसुम - खरशृङ्गयोरिव युक्तः स स्थाणु-पुरुषयोः ॥ १४९ ॥ (१६९७)
Ma kuru Vyakta samsayamasati na samśayasamudbhavo yuktaḥ | Khakusuma-kharaśrigayoriva yuktab sa sthānu purusayob. 149 ]
Trans.-1490 Vyakta! Do not entertain doubt. The doubt about non-existent (objects) is improper as in the case of kha-kusuma (flower of the sky) and kharaśrňga (horn of an ass). It is proper (only ) with regard to ( existent objects like) sthanu and purusd (1697)
टीका - आयुष्मन् व्यक्त ! मा कृथाः संशयं मा भूताभावं बुध्यस्व, गतोऽसति भूतकदम्बके मंशयः खकुसुम- खरविषाणयोरिव न युक्तः, अपि स्वभावनिश्चय एव स्यात् । सत्स्वेव च भूतेषु स्थाणु- पुरुषादिष्विव संशयो युक्तः । यदि पुनरसत्यपि वस्तुनि संदेहः स्यात् तदाऽविशेषेण खरविषाणादिष्वपि स्यादिति भावः ।। १४९ ।। (१६९७)
D. C. - 0 long-lived Vyakta / Don't be dubious about the existence of bhūtas. Because the doubt about non-existent objects is totally unjustifible as in the case of kha-kusuma and kharaśriga, where abhāva is already fixed up. It can be
Jain Education International
For Private Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org
