________________
: 108 : Jinabhadra Gani's
[ The second "karma." Whence ? He replies-- From the fruit i. e., from that differenoe in the fruit (achieved by different people with equal moans )." How is karma' proved on the strength of that difference of fruit ? He replies :
• From its being an offeot, " i. R., because that difference of fruit is an effect. There is inyeriably a cause corresponding to what is an effect, just as atoms of earth are the cause of * pot. ” and in this case the cause is an action. “ The effect of notions is different from those actions" and it can be proved here that, that very karman' is the unseen fruit of all actions What kind of action is it? It is different from those actions. Sidoe this karman' is an effect und since actions are the cause, and sinou an effect and a cause must be mutually different, the • karman' is different from those actions. 1624
The author states an objection to this and its reply :माह नणु मुत्तमेवं मुत्तं चिय कनमुत्तिमत्ताओ।
JOITUST. TEFT FTATUTEN JETT Hull (8874) Aşa saņu muttamdvam muttam ciya kajjamuttimattão Iba jaha muttattaņao gbadassa parmāņavo mūttā 77 (1625)
[ 73 gata rufaalia il
21 ocaat of Rurat gai: il 99 (7874)11 Aha panu mûrtamevam mürtamdva kāryamurtimattvāti Iha yathā mürtatvato gbatasya parmāņavo mūrtāḥ. (1625) ]
Trans.--77 ( The opponent will say, ) " Then the action (karman ) has a physical form (mūrta ).” We (the Siddhāntin) would reply, “ The action has indeed a physical form because its effect (viz., the body ) has a physical form. In this world the atoms (paramánus ) the cause of the pot, the effect which has a physical form, will have also a physical form." (1625)
दीका-बाह प्रेरका ननु यदि कार्याणां घरीरादीनां दर्शनात् वत्का
Jain Education International
For Private & Personal Use Only
www.jainelibrary.org