5
Lo OAL OFANTO ODA ODEN OPAL O ODEO VAN OVAL OLIN oP OTIS ODA OPIN OUAN OVA OVI OVA 0 PINOYOVIAY OPAC
had even theslightest doubt about any utterance or the concept,
he came to the Lord to remove his misgivings. Gautam’s doubt
was based on becoming moreclear about the concept, it was not
o
I sceptical. In Upanishads also contemplation—understanding
R
P
o
based on logic was considered necessary. But that logic should not
xRV
oF be such that shakes the very faith. When there is controversy
ds
Par between logic and faith, one should understand the limitation of
o
t
2a
ar his knowledge keeping his faith firm in the Lord. He should
o
1
understand that his mind is not able to grasp the subtle concept
S
I
A
P due to pervert knowledge or wrongbeliefs ofthe earlier life-span.
c
O
L
R
1hTA (2) Kankha—Inclination towards wrong faith due to some
O
L
ciFA worldly grandeuror attraction.
O
(3) Viigichha—Doubtin fruit ofreligious activities.
:
(4) Parpasand Pasansa—At present, the word pakhandis
used to denote unreal or deceitful presentation and Pakhandiis T EA
R°o
O
one who hasdeceitful faith. But in good old days, this word did 1 f
not have any disgusting meaning. It simply meant religion—
e
Sampradaya, a particular religious approach. Here also it has M“pey
O
the same meaning. Parpasand meansthefollowersof faith other A
M
R
than Jainism. To appreciate them means lowering down one’s gO°o
3
B
faith or shakiness in one’s faith.
s
(5) Parpasand Santhave—Sanstava means conduct or
he
acquaintance. a
s
wyay
o
*
o
e
w *
n
O
WI Tae wae a aarahaenl q wedi, az, aban, *
S
O
A
ASA, TAIT | W
R
O
V
v4, ge ae actors a qa sioner aa a da ye S
E
I
MAI AY UNS, hry Tar aay Tel BAT Tes) F ga yore e O
A
D
O
(9) aer—agy ante ar aaargeea Hart Seq Stet i (2) AIH, AIA
A
Y
I
R
O
rsWaa : WaT sea ( 33) Anand Gathapati:First Chapter
ATR NATED VETO STENT} SVE VAT NVELT NV ECP TOPSV ALP IVE NVA CP NVETOPNVATOP ALOP ETOP ATOPRVPOPAVAL) ORES ORESORNS ORNS UNG
1) 4
