________________
272
Prakrit Verses in Sanskrit Works on Poetics
1250) ...Sadimia (?).....
(p. 1046)
This verse, though it shows gaps and is corrupt, is easily identified to be the same verse as " Tie Savisesadamia" etc., cited further on (p. 1224) to illustrate Srigāra-Vrddhih. The verse is cited also in SK (V. v. 350, p. 678) to illustrate katha-vyapini nayika':
तीए सविसेस-दूमिअ-(दूणिअ-)सवत्ति-हिअाएँ णिव्वलंत-सिणेहं । पिअ-गरुआए णिमि सोहाग-गुणाण अग्गभूमीऍ परं॥ (तया सविशेष-दून ( = संतापित) सपत्नी-हृदयया स्पष्टीभूत-स्नेहम् । प्रिय-गुरूकृतया ( = गौरवितया)न्यस्तं सौभाग्य-गुणानामग्रभूम्यां पदम् ॥)
The context is of ' vipaksabhibhava'. The verse speaks of the nayika (Rukmini) as 'dimiasavatti-hiaa' and 'piya (= Hari)-garuia'; and we know from SK (V. v. 350, p. 678) that the present verse illustrates 'katha-vyapini-nayika' and the succeeding verse (SK V. v. 351, p. 678) 'pratinayika' where we have a reference to Hari, Rukuini and the pranayini offended by Hari (that is Satyabhāmā) by his gift of 'tridasa-kusumadāma'; the verse is in Skandhaka metre. We may therefore reasonably draw the inference that the present verse is drawn from Harivijaya (now lost).
1251) Daratthaviasuradumami......
(p. 1047) दार-ढविअ-सुर-दुमं तं चिअ सग्ग-कुसुमोवआरग्घविरं । अण्णं च सच्चविज्जइ परिओस-परित्त-परिअणं तीऍ घरं ॥ . (द्वार-स्थापित-सुर-द्रुमं तदेव स्वर्गकुसुमोपचार-राजितम् । अन्यच्च दृश्यते परितोष-परीत-परिजनं तस्या गृहम् ॥)
This verse, in Skandhaka metre, is further on (p. 1221) cited by Bhoja to illustrate 'Parijana-pramodah'.
As there is the mention of the celestial tree (Parijata) planted in front of her (Satyabhāma's) mansion we may safely take that the verse is drawn from Harivijaya (now lost).
1252)
Panaaparipuranenavi......
(p. 1047) पणअ-परिपूरणेण विअअ-भूसिअ-पिअअमागमेण अ गरुओ। पसरइ लद्धत्थामो, अण्णण्ण-रसंतरेहिं तीऍ पहरिसो ॥ (प्रणय-परिपूरणेन विजय-भूषित-प्रियतमागमेन च गुरुकः । प्रसरति लब्धस्थामाऽन्योन्य-रसान्तरैस्तस्याः प्रहर्षः ॥)
This verse, which is in Skandhaka metre, is again cited on p. 1221 to illistrate 'manahpraharsah. ' From its style it appears that it possibly belongs to Harivijaya (now lost).