Agam 15 Upang 04 Pragnapana Sutra Stahanakvasi

SR No.: 003483
Original Sutra Author: Shyamacharya
Author: Madhukarmuni, Gyanmuni, Shreechand Surana, Shobhachad Bharilla
Publisher: Agam Prakashan Samiti
Publication Year: 1983
Total Pages: 1524
Language: Prakrit, Hindi
Classification: Book_Devnagari
File Size: 37 MB

Page 404

पांचवाँ विशेषपर (पर्यायपद)] [371 स्थिति वाला पृथ्वीकायिक संख्यातगुण अधिक है। इसी प्रकार अप्कायिक से वनस्पतिकायिक तक के एकेन्द्रिय जीवों की अपनी-अपनी स्थिति के अनुसार त्रिस्थानपतित न्यूनाधिकता समझ लेनी चाहिए / ___ भावों (वर्णादि या मति-अज्ञानादि के पर्यायों) की अपेक्षा से षट्स्थानपतित न्यूनाधिकता होती है, वहाँ उसे इस प्रकार समझना चाहिए---एक पृथ्वीकायिक आदि, दूसरे पृथ्वीकायिक आदि से अनन्तभागहीन, असंख्यातभागहीन और संख्यातभागहीन अथवा संख्यातगुणहीन, असंख्यातगुणहीन और अनन्तगुणहीन तथा अनन्तभाग-अधिक, असंख्यातभाग-अधिक और संख्यातभाग-अधिक तथा संख्यातगुणा, असंख्यातगुणा और अनन्तगुणा अधिक है। इसी प्रकार पृथ्वीकायिक जीव के वर्गादि या मतिप्रज्ञानादि विभिन्न भावपर्यायों की अपेक्षा से षट्स्थानपतित हीनाधिकता की तरह अप्कायिक आदि एकेन्द्रियजीवों की षट्स्थानपतित हीनाधिकता समझ लेनी चाहिए। इन सब दृष्टियों से पृथ्वीकायिकादि प्रत्येक एकेन्द्रिय जीव के पर्यायों की अनन्तता सिद्ध होती है।' विकलेन्द्रिय एवं तियंच पंचेन्द्रिय जीवों के अनन्त पर्यायों का निरूपण 448. बेइंदियाणं पुच्छा। गोयमा ! अणंता पज्जवा पण्णता / से केणठेणं भंते ! एवं बुच्चति बेइंदियाणं प्रणता पज्जवा पण्णता? गोयमा ! बेइंदिए बेइंदियस्स दबटुयाए तुल्ले, पदेसट्टयाए तुल्ले, प्रोगाहणट्टयाए सिय होणे सिय तुल्ले सिय प्रभहिएजति होणे प्रसंखेज्जतिभागहीणे वा संखेज्जतिभागहीणे वा संखेज्जगुणहीणे वा असंखेज्जगुणहीणे वा, अह अन्महिए असंखेज्जभागममहिए वा संखेज्जभागमभहिए वा संखेज्जगुणमभइए वा असंखेज्जगुणमन्भहए वा; ठितीए तिढाणवडिते; वण्ण-गंध-रस-फास-प्राभिणिबोहियणाण-सुतणाण-मतिअण्णाण-सुत अण्णाण-प्रचक्खुदंसणपज्जवेहि य छट्ठाणवडिते / [448 प्र.] भगवन् ! द्वीन्द्रिय जीवों के कितने पर्याय कहे गए हैं ? [448 उ] गौतम ! अनन्त पर्याय कहे गए हैं। [प्र.] भगवन् ! किस कारण से ऐसा कहा जाता है कि द्वीन्द्रिय जीवों के अनन्त पर्याय हैं ? [उ.] गौतम ! एक द्वीन्द्रिय जीव दूसरे द्वीन्द्रिय से द्रव्य की अपेक्षा से तुल्य है, प्रदेशों की अपेक्षा से तुल्य है, (किन्तु) अवगाहना की दृष्टि से कदाचित् हीन है, कदाचित् तुल्य है, और कदाचित् अधिक है / यदि हीन होता है, (तो) या तो असंख्यातभाग हीन होता है, या संख्यातभागहीन होता है, अथवा संख्यातगुण हीन या असंख्यातगुण हीन होता है। अगर अधिक होता है तो असंख्यातभाग अधिक, या संख्यातभाग अधिक, अथवा संख्यातगुणा या असंख्यातगुणा अधिक होता है। स्थिति की अपेक्षा से त्रिस्थान-पतित हीनाधिक होता है, तथा वर्ण-गन्ध-रस-स्पर्श के तथा प्राभिनि 1. प्रज्ञापनासूत्र, मलय. वृत्ति, पत्रांक 186

Translation AI Generated

[Fifth Special (Synonym)] [The Earth-bodied being with 371 states has more numerical qualities. Similarly, the tri-locational inferiority and superiority of the one-sensed beings from the non-bodied to the plant-bodied should be understood according to their respective states / _ In terms of emotions (synonyms of color, etc. or intellect, ignorance, etc.), there is six-locational inferiority and superiority, there it should be understood as follows - one Earth-bodied, etc., is infinite-partless, innumerable-partless and numerical-partless or numerical-qualityless, innumerable-qualityless and infinite-qualityless, and infinite-part-more, innumerable-part-more and numerical-part-more, and numerical-quality, innumerable-quality and infinite-quality more. Similarly, the six-locational inferiority and superiority of the non-bodied, etc., one-sensed beings should be understood like the six-locational inferiority and superiority of the Earth-bodied being in terms of different emotional synonyms like class, etc. or intellect, knowledge, etc. From all these perspectives, the infinity of the synonyms of each one-sensed being from the Earth-bodied, etc. is proven.'] The infinite synonyms of the two-sensed and the five-sensed beings with three senses are described in 448. [448 Q] Lord! How many synonyms of the two-sensed beings have been said? [448 A] Gautama! Infinite synonyms have been said. [Q] Lord! Why is it said that there are infinite synonyms of the two-sensed beings? [A] Gautama! One two-sensed being is equal to another two-sensed being in terms of substance, equal in terms of regions, (but) in terms of comprehension, it is perhaps inferior, perhaps equal, and perhaps superior / If it is inferior, (then) it is either innumerable-part inferior, or numerical-part inferior, or numerical-quality inferior or innumerable-quality inferior. If it is superior, then it is innumerable-part superior, or numerical-part superior, or numerical-quality superior or innumerable-quality superior. In terms of state, it is tri-locational inferior and superior, and in terms of color, smell, taste, touch, and the knowledge of the perception of the self, the knowledge of the self, the knowledge of the intellect, the knowledge of the self, and the knowledge of the self, it is six-locational inferior and superior / [448 A] Lord! How many synonyms of the two-sensed beings have been said? [448 A] Gautama! Infinite synonyms have been said. [Q] Lord! Why is it said that there are infinite synonyms of the two-sensed beings? [A] Gautama! One two-sensed being is equal to another two-sensed being in terms of substance, equal in terms of regions, (but) in terms of comprehension, it is perhaps inferior, perhaps equal, and perhaps superior / If it is inferior, (then) it is either innumerable-part inferior, or numerical-part inferior, or numerical-quality inferior or innumerable-quality inferior. If it is superior, then it is innumerable-part superior, or numerical-part superior, or numerical-quality superior or innumerable-quality superior. In terms of state, it is tri-locational inferior and superior, and in terms of color, smell, taste, touch, and the knowledge of the perception of the self, the knowledge of the self, the knowledge of the intellect, the knowledge of the self, and the knowledge of the self, it is six-locational inferior and superior / [448 A] Lord! How many synonyms of the two-sensed beings have been said? [448 A] Gautama! Infinite synonyms have been said. [Q] Lord! Why is it said that there are infinite synonyms of the two-sensed beings? [A] Gautama! One two-sensed being is equal to another two-sensed being in terms of substance, equal in terms of regions, (but) in terms of comprehension, it is perhaps inferior, perhaps equal, and perhaps superior / If it is inferior, (then) it is either innumerable-part inferior, or numerical-part inferior, or numerical-quality inferior or innumerable-quality inferior. If it is superior, then it is innumerable-part superior, or numerical-part superior, or numerical-quality superior or innumerable-quality superior. In terms of state, it is tri-locational inferior and superior, and in terms of color, smell, taste, touch, and the knowledge of the perception of the self, the knowledge of the self, the knowledge of the intellect, the knowledge of the self, and the knowledge of the self, it is six-locational inferior and superior / [448 A] Lord! How many synonyms of the two-sensed beings have been said? [448 A] Gautama! Infinite synonyms have been said. [Q] Lord! Why is it said that there are infinite synonyms of the two-sensed beings? [A] Gautama! One two-sensed being is equal to another two-sensed being in terms of substance, equal in terms of regions, (but) in terms of comprehension, it is perhaps inferior, perhaps equal, and perhaps superior / If it is inferior, (then) it is either innumerable-part inferior, or numerical-part inferior, or numerical-quality inferior or innumerable-quality inferior. If it is superior, then it is innumerable-part superior, or numerical-part superior, or numerical-quality superior or innumerable-quality superior. In terms of state, it is tri-locational inferior and superior, and in terms of color, smell, taste, touch, and the knowledge of the perception of the self, the knowledge of the self, the knowledge of the intellect, the knowledge of the self, and the knowledge of the self, it is six-locational inferior and superior / [448 A] Lord! How many synonyms of the two-sensed beings have been said? [448 A] Gautama! Infinite synonyms have been said. [Q] Lord! Why is it said that there are infinite synonyms of the two-sensed beings? [A] Gautama! One two-sensed being is equal to another two-sensed being in terms of substance, equal in terms of regions, (but) in terms of comprehension, it is perhaps inferior, perhaps equal, and perhaps superior / If it is inferior, (then) it is either innumerable-part inferior, or numerical-part inferior, or numerical-quality inferior or innumerable-quality inferior. If it is superior, then it is innumerable-part superior, or numerical-part superior, or numerical-quality superior or innumerable-quality superior. In terms of state, it is tri-locational inferior and superior, and in terms of color, smell, taste, touch, and the knowledge