Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
[143 are the fixed field-occupying ones.] After them are the *bādaraniyoda* in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient (because in the *niśrā* of each *bādaraniyoda* innumerable insufficient *bādaraniyoda* are produced). After them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient (because the field is innumerable due to its pervasiveness). After them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* in a multitude, which are sufficient (because in the *sūkṣma* there are a multitude, which are sufficient, compared to the insufficient). The above-mentioned order should be known in relation to the field. For example, the fewest *bādaraniyoda* are sufficient, after them are the *bādaraniyoda* in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient, after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient, and after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* in a multitude, which are sufficient. In relation to the substance-field, the fewest *bādaraniyoda* are sufficient in relation to the substance, after them are the *bādaraniyoda* in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient in relation to the substance, after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient in relation to the substance, after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* in a multitude, which are sufficient in relation to the substance, after them are the *bādaraniyoda* in an infinite multitude in relation to the field, after them are the *bādaraniyoda* in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient in relation to the field, after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient in relation to the field, and after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* in a multitude, which are sufficient in relation to the field. The *alpabahutva* of the *niyoda* beings - in relation to the substance, the fewest *bādaraniyoda* beings are sufficient, after them are the *bādaraniyoda* beings in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient, after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* beings in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient, and after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* beings in a multitude, which are sufficient. In relation to the field, the fewest *bādaraniyoda* beings are sufficient, after them are the *bādaraniyoda* beings in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient, after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* beings in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient, and after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* beings in a multitude, which are sufficient. In relation to the substance-field, the fewest *bādaraniyoda* beings are sufficient in relation to the substance, after them are the *bādaraniyoda* beings in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient in relation to the substance, after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* beings in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient in relation to the substance, after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* beings in a multitude, which are sufficient in relation to the substance, after them are the *bādaraniyoda* beings in an innumerable multitude, which are sufficient in relation to the field, after them are the *bādaraniyoda* beings in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient in relation to the field, after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* beings in an innumerable multitude, which are insufficient in relation to the field, and after them are the *sūkṣmaniyoda* beings in a multitude, which are sufficient in relation to the field. 224. (a) Thus, venerable sir! In relation to the *niyoda* beings, are the *bādaraniyoda* beings, which are *pajjatta*, *apajjatta*, *suha*, and *bāyara*, in relation to the *davatthaya*, *paesatthaya*, *davapesaṭṭaya*, few, many, equal, or different? Gotama! In all cases, the *bādaraniyoda* beings, which are *pajjatta*, are in relation to the *davatthaya*, the *bādaraniyoda* beings, which are *apajjatta*, are in relation to the *davatthaya* in an innumerable multitude, the *suhamaniyoda* beings, which are *apajjatta*, are in relation to the *davatthaya* in an innumerable multitude, and the *suhamaniyoda* beings, which are *pajjatta*, are in relation to the *davatthaya* in a multitude. In relation to the *suhamaniyoda* beings, which are *pajjatta*, the *bādaraniyoda* beings, which are *pajjatta*, are in relation to the *davatthaya* in an infinite multitude, the *bādaraniyoda* beings, which are *apajjatta*, are in relation to the *davatthaya* in an innumerable multitude, the *suhamaniyoda* beings, which are *apajjatta*, are in relation to the *davatthaya* in an innumerable multitude, and the *suhamaniyoda* beings, which are *pajjatta*, are in relation to the *davatthaya* in a multitude. In relation to the *paesatthaya*, in all cases, the *bādaraniyoda* beings, which are *pajjatta*, are in relation to the *paesatthaya*, the *bādaraniyoda* beings, which are *apajjatta*, are in relation to the *paesatthaya* in an innumerable multitude, the *suhamaniyoda* beings, which are *apajjatta*, are in relation to the *paesatthaya* in an innumerable multitude, and the *suhamaniyoda* beings, which are *pajjatta*, are in relation to the *paesatthaya* in a multitude.