Disclaimer: This translation does not guarantee complete accuracy, please confirm with the original page text.
332
In the Mahapurana, the Uttara Purana, after giving the kingdom to his son, Sri Datta, he attained the state of Kshayika Samyaktva and, being peaceful, took up the practice of Samyama. || 14 || That Purushottama, having taken up the eleven Angas, bound himself with the sixteen Karana Bhavanas, and performed the auspicious karma of the Tirthankara, which is the last name. || 15 || At the end of his life, he attained Samadhi-death and became a radiant deva in the excellent, unsurpassed Vimana called Aparajita. || 16 || There, his lifespan was thirty-three oceans, his body was one hand tall, and he was endowed with all the characteristics of the devas of that Vimana, such as breathing, eating, and Leshya. || 17 || When the end of this Ahamindra's life came, and he was ready to depart from there after six months, there was a city called Mithila in the country called Vanga, in this Jambudvipa, adorned with the Jambubhumi tree. There, a wealthy king named Vijayamaha raja, a descendant of Bhagavan Rishabhadeva, belonging to the Kashyapa gotra, ruled. || 18-16 || Just as the rising sun makes the world red with affection, so too, when he ascended the throne, he made the whole world happy with affection. And just as the sun itself becomes free from the redness of passion, so too, he freed the world from the redness of passion. In the same way, as the king became free from the joy of detachment, so too, he freed the world from the joy of detachment. In short, the happiness and unhappiness of the world depended on him, and rightly so, because he had done such penance, and such was its effect. || 20 || Since the rise of his virtuous karma had brought about a multitude of virtues and Lakshmi had chosen him, the three Purusharthas of Dharma, Artha, and Kama were well manifested in him. || 21 || In that king's kingdom, if there was heat, it was only in the sun, there was no other heat-suffering. If there was anger, it was only in the lustful people, not in the others there. If there was the name of conflict, it was only in the bodies, not elsewhere. If there was detachment, it was only in the munis, there was no lack of attachment-affection in the other people there. The taking up of the meaning of others, the taking up of the meaning expounded by other poets, was only in the bad poets, not in the other people there. The binding, the creation of various bindings, such as the umbrella binding, was only in the poems, not in the other people there, who were not bound by ropes and other things. If there was debate, it was only in the learned who desired victory, not in the other people there, who did not have conflict. The spread of the arrow, the spread of a type of grass, was only in the rivers, not in the people there, who did not have the spread of arrows. If there was instability, it was only in the celestial beings, who were constantly
1 Ahamindra. 2 In the book, the reading is 'Shravneet Gunaneva Sarvan Mukatodayat'. In the second pada, there is a mistake.