Paumchariu Part 1

SR No.: 002523
Original Sutra Author: Swayambhudev
Author: H C Bhayani
Publisher: ZZZ Unknown
Publication Year: 1953
Total Pages: 458
Language: Sanskrit, English
Classification: Book_Devnagari & Literature
File Size: 11 MB

Page 110

INTRODUCTION
3 4 10, vandhahum 3 4 10, lehum 2 15 8. paribhamahum 6 13 7, pekkhahum 12 9 7, parisujjhahum 19 1 106 (in the last seven cases the sense has different shades of indefiniteness).
c) -hi is the only termination for the Second Person Singular and -hu or -ho (acchahu 3 4 10, gavesaho 12 8 96, jánahu 4 5 2) for the Plural.
d) Besides the normal -ai, -ei appears in the Third Person Singular mostly in metrically conditioned cases (khañcei 3 12 5, karei 4 12 6).
e) -ahim is not found in the Third Person Plural.
$103. The desinences of the Future are the same as those of the Present Indicative; only the special base is formed by adding -(e)sa. Instances: 1. plur. karesahum 3 6 11a; 2. plur. kareşaho 12 8 9b; 3. sing. hosai 4 5 4, vahesai 6 11 3; 3. plur. hosanti 5 9 10.
The -ha type of future is not found in our text. $104. Imperative.
a) Imper. 1. pl. (These cases can be also regarded as present Ind. 1. plur. forms used in an indefinite sense) jahum 2 12 8, 3 4 106; vandahum 3 4 10b, karahum 5 10 7, bhamādahum 5 10 8, paisahum 6 13 9, paisarahum 7 9 1.
b) Imper. 2. Sing.
i) -ahi: padarisahi 2 9 6, genhahi 6 4 9b, lahahi 19 15 8, bhuñjahi 12 115, jāhi 2 9 6, jajjāhi (intensive) 15 5 6, jivahi 7 12 1, vollahi 18 8 3, dakkhavahi 19 15 2, ehi 7 91;
ii) -u: jiu 4 3 8, nisaru 4 7 2, maru 5 7 2, hasu, bhuñju 7 12 3, taju, jujjhu 7 12 3, cau; samcaru 7 12 4, suņu 7 12 5, cadu, āu, padu 19 15 3, bhamu, ramu 19 15 5, utthutthu (intensive) 10 4 4;
iii) short -e: kare 4 3 2,9 26, (rhyme-secure at) 6 16 8, 15 5 6, bhuñje, 4 12 6, kahe (rhyme-secure) 6 13 7, 8 6 9, pāle 7 12 6, anuhunje 12 5 13, anubhuñje 12 10 9b, nihāle 12 5 14a, mue 15 7 2, jotte 19 2 5, dhare 19 15 6.
iv)-i: volli 2 14 1, suni 5 1 1, kahi 1 9 6, parini 10 5 8.
$105. The forms in short -el--i as also in -u are commonly used. There are several forms in short -e. The Ms. which leads in preserying original orthographic features, is also leading in attesting the imper. forms in short -e. It is quite naturally explained by Jacobi and Alsdorf as a development of the Sk. opt. 2. sing. in -en. The -i forms represent a phonetically later stage. Tagare's suggestion to explain it as due to passive + zero or to the loss of -h in -(a)hi is quite unattractive.
The term -u is also to be explained in accordance with the Ap. tendency to turn final -a into -u. It has nothing to do with the -u of the 3. sing.
$106. Imper. 2 pl. ends in -aho or -ahu: todaho, dohaho, chandaho 2 13 4, bhindaho 5 11 5 (rhyme-secure), joyaho 2 3 9b (rhyme-secure), takekhaho 5 5 1 (rhyme-secure), bhanaho, mandaho 4 8 9, nitthavaho, patthavaho 6 2 8, hanaho, khanaho 747, dharaho 7 7 2;
āgacchahu (rhyme-secure) 3 4 10b, āmellahu 3 7 4, karahu 4 3 3, 4 5 2, thāhu 2 16 11, kahahu 4 1 9b.
(1) Tagare, 1948, 298.